Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 11;8:522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-19089-w

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Interior XDT reconstruction with fat and muscle region superimposed with a CT image of the sample. The inset shows the XDT contrast between fat and muscle at q = 0.08 1 and 0.16 1. (b) Reconstructed diffraction form factor of fat and muscle inside the ham sample. (c) Simulated absorbed dose of interior XDT scan. (d) Simulated absorbed dose of global XDT scan. (e) The difference in absorbed dose distribution between the global and interior scan. The total dose administrated to the sample is reduced by 83%. The circle marks the interior region. The scale bar represents 5 mm.