Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 12;18:5. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0582-1

Table 2.

Changes in knowledge and intent to initiate lung cancer screening before and after viewing the decision aid (n = 50)

Pre Post Difference (95% CI), p-value
Potential Harms of Screening
 Who do you think is more likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer?
People who are screened for lung cancer.a
People who are NOT screened for lung cancer
36% 62% 26% (8%, 44%), p < 0.001
 ALL lung cancers will eventually cause illness and death if they are not found and treated.
True/Falsea/Don’t Know
6% 54% 48% (31%, 65%), p < 0.001
 When screening finds lung cancer, doctors can tell whether the cancer will ever cause harm.
True/Falsea/Don’t Know
16% 62% 46% (62%, 30%), p < 0.001
 Even lung cancers that may not cause any health problems are likely to be treated.
Truea/False/Don’t Know
66% 80% 14% (4%, 32%), p = 0.09
 Screening tests lead some people to get cancer treatments that they do not need.
Truea/False/Don’t Know
18% 76% 58% (40%, 76%), p < 0.001
 Screening tests find harmless lung cancers about as often as they prevent death from lung cancer.
Truea/False/Don’t Know
24% 52% 28% (9%, 47%), p < 0.001
 Which of these 2 statements best describes over-detection from screening?
Screening finds a cancer that would never have caused troublea
Screening finds an abnormality but extra tests show it is not cancer
16% 28% 12% (3%, 27%), p = 0.08
 An abnormal result from lung cancer screening always means the person has lung cancer.
True/Falsea/Don’t Know
66% 88% 22% (5%, 39%), p < 0.001
Chances of Benefitting from Screening
 For the next question, please think about 1000 current and former smokers who are getting screened every year for lung cancer. Out of 1000 people who get a chest CT scan, about how many will have their lives prolonged?
0
1-5a
6-10a
11-30a
31–100
101–200
201–400
401–700
701–1000
Don’t Know
18% 48% 30% (12%, 48%), p < 0.001
Average Knowledge Score (0–9 points) 2.6 5.5 2.8 (2.1,3.6), p < 0.001

aCorrect response(s)