-
•
Easy to harvest
-
•
No anterior knee pain
-
•
Large sectional area
-
•
Cosmetic (smaller incision)
-
•
Lower donor site morbidity
-
•
Comparable strength to native ACL
-
•
Fast graft acquisition
-
•
Easy graft passage
-
•
Less risk of Cyclops syndrome
-
•
Custom individualized graft length and diameter
-
•
Used if patellar chondropathy; patellar pain; elderly patients; patients with kneeling activities; patients involved in jumping; aesthetic concerns; revision surgery after BTB reconstruction
-
•
Imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic evaluation of the ACL remnant dimensions help to plan the ACL reconstruction graft
-
•
In high-performance athletes with patellar misalignment: 2 semitendinosus tendons of each knee (avoid residual muscle tears)
|
-
•
More difficult graft fixation/prolonged ligamentization of the graft
-
•
Soft-tissue healing
-
•
Hematoma
-
•
Increased risk of infection (compared with BTB)
-
•
Graft size can be unpredictable
-
•
Complex graft preparation
-
•
Decreased flexion strength
-
•
Weakening of ACL agonists
-
•
Decreased internal rotation strength
-
•
Graft laxity
-
•
Instrumented (KT) laxity
-
•
Tunnel widening
-
•
Saphenous nerve injury
-
•
Not suitable for certain athletes who rely on their hamstring muscles (medial instability)
-
•
Less stiffness than the native ACL
-
•
Risk of residual muscle tearing (biceps femoris and semimembranosus)
|