Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Zoonoses Public Health. 2017 Nov 14;65(1):e148–e154. doi: 10.1111/zph.12423

TABLE 2.

Equine serological surveillance of Influenza virus types C and D in 2015

Farm ID Location D/OK D/660 C/JHB



Positive\Total Average Titre Positive\Total Average Titre Positive\Total Average Titre
1 SD 6\42 51.7 3\42 46.7 14\42 60

2 SD 0\13 0\13 2\13 40

3 SD 1\11 80 1\11 40 0\11

4 SD 0\9 1\9 60 2\9 60

5 SD 2\9 40 0\9 0\9

6 SD 1\7 40 0\7 0\7

7 SD 1\7 45 0\7 1\7 40

8 SD 1\6 60 0\6 0\6

9 SD 0\5 0\5 1\5 40

10 SD 1\5 40 0\5 0\5

11 SD 2\5 80 2\5 50 0\5

12 SD 1\5 45 0\5 0\5

13 SD 0\5 0\5 1\5 40

14 SD 1\5 80 1\5 80 0\5

15 MN 2\4 70 2\4 80 0\4

16 SD 0\4 0\4 2\4

17 SD 0\4 1\4 40 0\4

18 NE 0\4 0\4 1\4 40

19 MN 4\4 70 4\4 60 0\4

20 SD 0\4 0\4 1\4 40

21 NE 1\4 50 0\4 0\4

22 SD 0\4 1\4 45 0\1

23 SD 1\4 60 1\4 80 0\4

24 SD 1\4 60 1\4 40 0\4

25 SD 1\4 40 1\4 45 0\4

26 SD 0\4 0\4 1\4 40

27 NE 0\3 0\3 0\3

28 SD 1\3 40 0\3 0\3

29 SD 0\3 0\3 1\3 40

30 SD 1\3 60 2\3 70 0\3

31 SD 0\3 1\3 80 0\3

32 SD 0\3 1\3 40 0\3

33 SD 1\2 40 0\2 0\2

34 WY 0\2 0\2 1\2 40

35 IA 0\2 0\2 1\2 80

36 SD 1\2 60 0\2 1\2 40

37 SD 0\2 0\2 2\2 60

38 SD 1\2 40 0\2 0\2

39 SD 0\2 0\2 1\2 80

40 SD 1\2 40 0\2 0\2

41 SD 1\2 60 1\2 80 0\2

42 SD 1\2 80 1\2 80 1\2 40

43 SD 1\2 60 1\2 40 0\2

44 SD 0\2 0\2 1\2 40

45 SD 0\2 0\2 1\2 80

46 SD 1\2 80 1\2 80 0\2

47 SD 0\2 1\2 40 1\2 40

Total 36\230 28\230 37\230

Only farms with at least one serum sample positive to at least one of the listed three viruses were included. This table does not include the farms that only had one sample. Each farm ID is accompanied by its location by state within the USA. For each farm, the number of samples positive to the virus over the number of total samples and the average HI titre of the positive samples are shown. A “–” indicates the samples were negative to the virus.