Table 4. Comparison of goodness of fit to viral load data.
We compare the loglikelihood, AICc and BIC of each model using both fits to the mean data and mixed effects fits. Each row represents a different model and the models are clustered by type.
| Model | -2logl | AICc | BIC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Target cell models | |||
| Target cell model (1) | 1298 | 1320 | 1346 |
| Target cell limited w/eclipse phase | 1294 | 1321 | 1351 |
| …with virus in steady state (QSS) | 1312 | 1330 | 1352 |
| …with QSS and eclipse phase | 1314 | 1336 | 1362 |
|
| |||
| Innate immunity models | |||
| Innate immunity model (2) | 1235 | 1270 | 1309 |
| Simplified induction of immunity | 1282 | 1304 | 1330 |
| Pawelek model | 1278 | 1312 | 1352 |
| Simplified Pawelek | 1291 | 1309 | 1330 |
| Saenz model | 1258 | 1315 | 1377 |
|
| |||
| Adaptive immunity models | |||
| Adaptive immunity model (3) | 1234 | 1269 | 1308 |
| Simplified adaptive immunity | 1312 | 1335 | 1360 |
| Simplified adaptive w/saturated killing | 1269 | 1300 | 1335 |
|
| |||
| Minimal immunity model (8) | 1241 | 1264 | 1289 |