. 2018 Jan 12;8:640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18593-3

Table 1.

Table for comparison of all carbon-based wire/fiber-shaped supercapacitors with the present work.

Materials	Electrolyte	Specific capacitance	Energy density	Power density	Working voltage	Reference
rGO/CNT core-sheath fibres	PVA/H₃PO₄	5.3 mF cm⁻¹177 mF cm⁻²	3.84 μW h cm⁻²3.5 mW h cm⁻³	0.02 μW cm⁻²	0.8 V	³⁴
3D graphene-RACNT	PVA/H₂SO₄	158 F cm⁻³89.4 mF cm⁻²23.9 mF cm⁻¹	—	—	0.8 V	⁵⁷
MWCNT fibres	PVA/H₃PO₄	13.31 F g⁻¹0.015 mF cm⁻¹3.01 mF cm⁻²	174.40 mA h g⁻¹94.37 mA h cm⁻³	—	1 V	¹⁵
CNT/OMC composite	PVA/H₃PO₄	1.91 mF cm⁻¹39.7 mF cm⁻²	1.77 μW h cm⁻²0.085 μW h cm⁻¹	0.043 μW cm⁻²	1 V	¹³
ErGO on Au wire	PVA/H₃PO₄	11.4 μF cm⁻¹0.726 mF cm⁻²	—	—	1 V	²⁴
Carbon microfibre/SWCNT/ N-doped rGO	PVA/H₃PO₄	116.3 mF cm⁻²300 F cm⁻³	6.3 μW h cm⁻³	1.085 μW cm⁻³	1 V	⁴
GF@3D-G	PVA/H₃PO₄	40 F g⁻¹20 μF cm⁻¹1.7 mF cm⁻²	0.17 μW h cm⁻²	100 μW cm⁻²	0.8 V	¹⁸
AC fibre from GO	PVA/H₃PO₄	43.8 F g⁻¹27.6 F cm⁻³	2.5 mW h cm⁻³3.96 mW h g⁻¹	5 mW cm⁻³	0.8 V	⁵⁵
Hydrothermally reduced GO on SSW	PVA/H₃PO₄- Na₂MoO₄	18.75 mF cm⁻¹38.2 mF cm⁻²	2.6 μW h cm⁻¹5.3 μW h cm⁻²	—	1 V	³⁰
Self-assembled GA on Cu wire	PVP/NaI	62.3 F g⁻¹12.5 mF cm⁻¹	—	—	1 V	³³
pErGO@Cuf/Cu wire	PVA/H ₃ PO ₄	81 F g ⁻¹ 40.5 mF cm ⁻¹ 283.5 mF cm ⁻²	11.25 W h Kg ⁻¹ 5.6 μW h cm ⁻¹ 39.3 μW h cm ⁻²	5 kW Kg ⁻¹ 2.5 mW cm ⁻¹ 17.6 mW cm ⁻²	1 V	This work

GO: graphene oxide; rGO: reduced GO; ErGO: electrochemically rGO; MWCNT: multi-walled carbon nanotube; SWCNT: single walled carbon nanotube; RACNT: radially aligned CNT; OMC: ordered mesoporous carbon; GF: graphene fiber; AC: activated carbon; SSW: stainless steel wire; GA: graphene aerogel; PVP: polyvinylpyrrolidone; PVA: poly-vinyl alcohol.