Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 8;8:2303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02303

Table 1.

Review of previous randomized controlled trial/longitudinal studies evaluating effects of instrumental music training on child cognitive function.

Study Costa-Giomi, 1999 Schellenberg, 2004 Roden et al., 2012 Roden et al., 2014
Experimental design Randomized controlled trial Randomized controlled trial Longitudinal study Longitudinal study
Age (years) 9 6 7.54 7.73
Final sample size 67 132 73 50
Group type Private piano lesson vs. no lesson Music (keyboard or voice) vs. control (drama or no lesson) Instrumental (guitar, cello, etc.) vs. natural science vs. no lesson Instrumental (guitar, cello, etc.) vs. natural science
Training length 3 years 36 weeks 18 months 18 months
Measures Developing Cognitive Abilities Test Beggs and Mouw, 1980; Musical Aptitude Profile Gordon, 1988; Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Bruininks, 1978; Canadian Achievement Test2 Canadian Test Centre, 1992; Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventories Coopersmith, 1981 Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III, Wechsler, 1991); Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement Kaufman and Kaufman, 1985; Behavioral Assessment System for Children Reynolds and Kamphaus, 1992 Verbal learning, Delayed recall, Verbal recognition Helmstaedter et al., 2001; Corsi Block, Matrix Span Hasselhorn et al., 2012 Corsi Block, One-syllable Word Span, Matrix Span, Couning Span, Complex Span, Color Span Backwards Hasselhorn et al., 2012
Main findings Piano group showed significant improvement in Developing Cognitive Ability Test after two years; however, there were no differences between the two groups after three years. Music group showed greater increase in full-scale IQ than did the control group. Instrumental group showed greater improvements on verbal memory (Verbal learning, Delayed recall, and Verbal recognition) than did the natural science group and the control group. Instrumental group showed greater improvements on phonological loop and central executive of working memory than did the control group.