Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 9;8:725. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00725

Table 3.

Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging variables in groups measured categorically.

wTMD group
pTMD group
iTMD group
n = 76 Column (%) n = 58 Column (%) n = 85 Column (%) p-Value Post hoc analysis
Effusion No 72 94.74 47 81.03 70 82.35 0.029 wTMD–pTMD
Yes 4 5.26 11 18.97 15 17.65 wTMD–iTMD
ADDWR No 45 59.21 38 65.52 56 65.88 0.634 n.s.
Yes 31 40.79 20 34.48 29 34.12
ADDWoR No 48 63.16 36 62.07 37 43.53 0.021 wTMD–pTMD
Yes 28 36.84 22 37.93 48 56.47 pTMD–iTMD
Disk deformity No 39 51.32 36 62.07 57 67.06 0.119 wTMD–iTMD
Yes 37 48.68 22 37.93 28 32.94
Condylar degeneration No 44 57.89 36 62.07 52 61.18 0.867 n.s.
Yes 32 42.11 22 37.93 33 38.82
VC of LPM No 39 51.32 36 62.07 57 67.06 0.049 wTMD–iTMD
Yes 37 48.68 22 37.93 28 32.94
SC of LPM No 45 59.21 31 53.45 53 62.35 0.777 n.s.
Yes 31 40.79 27 46.55 32 37.65

p-Value was obtained from χ2 test and the mean difference between groups was obtained from post hoc analysis with Boneferroni test. p-Value significance was set at <0.05.

ADDWR, anterior disk displacement with reduction; ADDWoR, anterior disk displacement without reduction; VC, volume change; SC, signal change; LPM, lateral pterygoid muscle; wTMD–pTMD, when the proportion of the presence of variable was significantly different between wTMD and pTMD groups; wTMD–iTMD, when the proportion of the presence of variable was significantly different between wTMD and iTMD groups; pTMD–iTMD, when the proportion of the presence of variable was significantly different between pTMD and iTMD groups; n.s., when there was no significant difference between groups.