Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 9;8:2287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02287

Table 3.

Mediation effect analyses with internal engagement at Time 3 as the mediator (N = 425–427).

Regression models summary DV: Personal growth (Time 4) DV: Academic achievement (Time 4)
IV: Time 1 Cognitive-behavioral competence IV: Time 1 General PYD IV: Time 1 Cognitive-behavioral competence IV: Time 1 General PYD
B SE t B SE t B SE t B SE t
Total effect of IV on DV 0.16 0.03 5.42*** 0.21 0.03 6.11*** 0.33 0.06 5.43*** 0.38 0.07 5.43***
IV TO MEDIATORS
Time 3 AC 0.26 0.04 6.08*** 0.28 0.05 5.67*** 0.26 0.04 6.03*** 0.27 0.05 5.61***
Time 3 LWP 0.21 0.04 4.75*** 0.25 0.08 4.92*** 0.21 0.04 4.77*** 0.25 0.05 4.89***
DIRECT EFFECTS OF MEDIATORS ON DV
Time 3 AC 0.16 0.04 4.12*** 0.16 0.04 4.15*** 0.36 0.08 4.48*** 0.37 0.08 4.59***
Time 3 LWP 0.06 0.04 1.67 0.06 0.04 1.52 0.04 0.08 0.48 0.03 0.08 0.40
Direct Effect of IV on DV 0.11 0.03 3.58*** 0.15 0.03 4.38*** 0.23 0.06 3.75*** 0.27 0.07 3.86***
Meditation effect summary Point estimate Bootstrapping (BC 95% CI) Point estimate Bootstrapping (BC 95% CI) Point estimate Bootstrapping (BC 95% CI) Point estimate Bootstrapping (BC 95% CI)
Lower Upper Lower Upper Lower Upper Lower Upper
Total 0.05 0.03 0.09 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.10 0.05 0.16 0.11 0.06 0.18
Time 3 AC 0.04 0.02 0.08 0.04 0.02 0.08 0.09 0.05 0.16 0.10 0.05 0.18
Time 3 LWP 0.01 −0.002 0.03 0.01 −0.004 0.04 0.01 −0.03 0.04 0.01 −0.03 0.05

Age, gender, family intactness, and family economic status were controlled. IV, Independent variable; DV, Dependent variable; PYD, positive youth development; AC, Academic challenge; LWP, Learning with peers; BC, Bias corrected; CI, Confidence interval;

***

p < 0.001.