. 2017 Aug 16;31(2):167–179. doi: 10.5713/ajas.17.0224

Table 3.

Genetic parameters across 21 loci in the 12 goose populations

Population¹⁾	F_IS	PIC	Mean heterozygosity		MNA		Number of loci departure from HWE

			Expected (H_E)	Observed (H_O)	Effective	Observed
WR	0.065	0.473	0.527	0.501	2.822	5.61	7
WC	0.148	0.461	0.520	0.444	2.722	4.9	5
BC	0.171	0.469	0.519	0.444	2.818	4.95	5
H	−0.101	0.612	0.668	0.737	3.86	6.2	16
Z	0.083	0.462	0.527	0.486	2.925	4.96	1
P	0.082	0.485	0.544	0.524	3.418	5.67	0
I	−0.013	0.448	0.504	0.505	3.159	4.95	0
C	0.102	0.473	0.532	0.471	3.222	5.71	2
Y	0.063	0.485	0.550	0.524	3.197	4.95	2
WG	0.06	0.42	0.464	0.43	2.661	5.3	2
CC	0.144	0.509	0.567	0.483	4.043	7.0	7
TC	0.205	0.484	0.542	0.438	3.583	5.9	6
Total	0.084	0.481	0.539	0.499	3.203	5.51	-

F_IS, the measure of the deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg proportions within subpopulation; PIC, polymorphism information content; MNA, mean number of alleles; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

¹⁾

WR, white Roman geese; WC, white Chinese geese; BC, brown Chinese geese; H, white Roman×white Chinese geese; Z,Y,P,I,C, white Roman geese from Z,Y,P,I,C farms respectively; WG, white Grimaud geese; CC, Chinese geese from private farm in Chiayi; TC, Chinese geese from private farm in Taoyuan.