. 2017 Aug 16;31(2):167–179. doi: 10.5713/ajas.17.0224

Table 4.

Pair-wise estimates of breed differentiation (F_ST) (below the diagonal) and genetic distance (above the diagonal) between each pair of the 13 goose populations

Population¹⁾	WR	WC	BC	H	BS	Z	P	I	C	Y	WG	CC	TC
WR	-	0.682	0.699	0.264	0.953	0.089	0.084	0.079	0.079	0.095	0.140	0.662	0.669
WC	0.412^*	-	0.154	0.235	0.851	0.732	0.701	0.722	0.681	0.714	0.703	0.195	0.175
BC	0.416^*	0.088^*	-	0.312	0.822	0.734	0.703	0.736	0.685	0.738	0.719	0.141	0.141
H	0.197^*	0.154^*	0.189^*	-	0.907	0.313	0.279	0.303	0.280	0.298	0.335	0.286	0.285
BS	0.573^*	0.574^*	0.552^*	0.510^*	-	0.979	0.976	0.983	0.955	0.988	0.958	0.854	0.859
Z	0.038^*	0.425^*	0.427^*	0.186^*	0.625^*	-	0.066	0.077	0.083	0.078	0.157	0.685	0.703
P	0.030^*	0.412^*	0.416^*	0.163^*	0.629^*	0.008	-	0.065	0.066	0.068	0.147	0.652	0.673
I	0.034^*	0.435^*	0.439^*	0.188^*	0.649^*	0.011^*	0.005	-	0.063	0.078	0.149	0.688	0.696
C	0.027^*	0.412^*	0.414^*	0.164^*	0.630^*	0.027^*	0.005	0.004	-	0.071	0.148	0.640	0.652
Y	0.033^*	0.405^*	0.415^*	0.164^*	0.627^*	0.027^*	0.005	0.018^*	0.006	-	0.168	0.698	0.691
WG	0.100^*	0.448^*	0.450^*	0.227^*	0.642^*	0.108^*	0.077^*	0.095^*	0.092^*	0.111^*	-	0.674	0.682
CC	0.389^*	0.121^*	0.089^*	0.138^*	0.553^*	0.394^*	0.376^*	0.402^*	0.374^*	0.383^*	0.425^*	-	0.098
TC	0.395^*	0.118^*	0.095^*	0.144^*	0.568^*	0.403^*	0.389^*	0.410^*	0.386^*	0.386^*	0.431^*	0.036^*	-

¹⁾

WR, white Roman geese; WC, white Chinese geese; BC, brown Chinese geese; H, white Roman×white Chinese geese; BS, black swan; Z,Y,P,I,C, white Roman geese from Z,Y,P,I,C farms respectively; WG, white Grimaud geese; CC, Chinese geese from private farm in Chiayi; TC, Chinese geese from private farm in Taoyuan.

Pairwise F_ST was significant at p<0.05.