Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2017 Dec 4;32(1):1–20. doi: 10.1007/s10822-017-0088-4

Table 3.

Top 10 submissions as ranked in order of decreasing Kendall’s tau for the affinity component of the challenge in Stages 1 and 2.

stage 1
Kendall’s Tau Software Used Submitter Name Group/PI Name Receipt ID
0.44 AutoDock Vina Olivier Bequignon In silico Drug Design Master g7q2q
0.44 AutoDock Vina Doha Naga In silico Drug Design Master 87x7c
0.44 Ichem-GRIM, HYDE Didier Rognan Didier Rognan 4ynsp
0.43 idock-RF-v3* Ho Leung Ng Ho Leung Ng 6pcik
0.43 Smina Matthew Baumgartner David Evans gzd7a
0.43 Glide, Gold, Amber-MMGBSA Yuan Hu Merck 6xixa
0.42 Smina Bentley Wingert Carlos Camacho 0kg1e
0.41 Glide Ashutosh Kumar Kam Y.J. Zhang ttgw7
0.40 Smina* Matthew Baumgartner David Evans aaveo
0.38 Ichem-GRIM, HYDE Didier Rognan Didier Rognan 2o6iv
Stage 2
Kendall’s Tau Software Used Submitter Name Group/PI Name Receipt ID
0.46 Smina Bentley Wingert Carlos Camacho f2wjs
0.44 Rhodium HTS Jonathan Bohmann Pharm. & Bioeng. Dept. 5zcmb
0.44 Smina Bentley Wingert Carlos Camacho 7c2tp
0.42 Smina Bentley Wingert Carlos Camacho fo0p4
0.41 SeeSAR, HYDE, MMGBSA Anonymous Anonymous dh2du
0.39 Vina David Koes David Koes wfe3c
0.38 In-house QSAR script Matthew Baumgartner David Evans naex2
0.38 PRODIGY webserver Alexandre Bonvin Alexandre Bonvin 0f7u7
0.37 In-house QSAR script Matthew Baumgartner David Evans hj31e
0.36 Smina Bentley Wingert Carlos Camacho aewpt