. 2018 Jan 10;8:2315. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02315

Table 3.

Path analysis.

Variable relations	Direct effect beta (t)	Indirect effect beta (t)	Total effect beta (t)
ξ1 → η1	0.31 (21.35)^**	–	0.31 (21.35)^**
ξ1 → η2	0.10 (7.26)^**	0.20 (18.56)^**	0.30 (19.05)^**
ξ1 → η3	0.14 (9.91)^**	0.22 (18.43)^**	0.36 (21.72)^**
ξ1 → η4	−0.02 (-1.64)	0.28 (20.96)^**	0.26 (15.05)^**
ξ1 → η5	0.13 (5.21)^**	0.12 (10.64)^**	0.25 (12.53)^**
ξ1 → η6	0.07 (5.27)^*	0.20 (13.20)^**	0.27 (13.95)^**
ξ2 → η1	0.55 (37.35)^**	–	0.55 (37.35)^**
ξ2 → η2	0.15 (9.76)^**	0.35 (25.49)^**	0.50 (31.99)^**
ξ2 → η3	0 (0.10)	0.38 (25.86)^**	0.38 (22.65)^**
ξ2 → η4	0.11 (5.85)^**	0.35 (23.35)^**	0.46 (27.03)^**
ξ2 → η5	0.01 (0.56)	0.16 (9.76)^**	0.17 (8.59)^**
ξ2 → η6	0.06 (3.57)^*	0.16 (9.21)^**	0.22 (11.53)^**

ξ1, Procedural justice; ξ2, Distributive justice; η1, Devoted behavior; η2, Responsible behavior; η3, Active behavior; η4, Innovative behavior; η5, Helping behavior; η6, Harmonious behavior;

P < 0.05,

^**

P < 0.001, beta: Standardized regression coefficient t: t-test value.