Skip to main content
. 2017 Autumn;18(4):253–257.

Table 2.

Proximate composition (mean±SD) of conventional (control) and reduced fat emulsion type sausage treatments

Treatments Moisture
(%)
Aw pH Ash
(%)
Protein
(%)
CHO
(%)
Fat
(%)
Fat reduction
(%)
Energy value
(kcal/100 g)
Control 59.90±0.42a 0.97±0.00a 6.50±0.02a 5.40±0.21a 11.20±0.11a 1.30±0.46a 22.20±0.14a 0 250.10±2.62a
I3 W3 1 62.90±0.49b 0.97±0.00a 6.50±0.01a 5.50±0.70a 11.20±0.22a 2.10±0.12a 16.30±0.14b 26.57 200.70±0.13b
I3 W6 2 65.90±0.84c 0.98±0.00b 6.40±0.14a 5.50±0.70a 11.30±0.08a 2.20±0.01a 13.20±0.07c 40.54 172.70±0.91c
I6 W6 3 65.90±0.14c 0.98±0.00b 6.50±0.02a 5.70±0.21a 11.10±0.02a 3.30±0.30b 10.10±0.14d 54.50 149.60±0.17d
I6 W12 4 72.20±0.91d 0.99±0.00c 6.60±0.14a 5.50±0.70a 11.20±0.02a 3.60±0.66b 4.10±0.14e 81.53 95.00±1.54e
1

3% inulin + 3% excess water,

2

3% inulin + 6% excess water,

3

6% inulin + 6% excess water, and

4

6% inulin + 12% excess water. Means with different superscript letters within the same column are significantly different at P<0.05