Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 29;37(13):1281–1290. doi: 10.1002/pd.5182

Table 2.

Termination rates determined from reviewed studies and the audits reported here compared to pre‐NIPT termination rates

Citation Termination Ratea Country Pre‐NIPT Termination Rate for DSb (year(s) obtained)
Lau et al26, 27 100%c Hong Kong Not found
Pettit et al28 63% United States 67% (1995‐2011)41
Vahanian et al29 0% United States 67% (1995‐2011)41
Shaw et al30 100%c Taiwan 68% (2001)45
Beamon et al31 60% United States 67% (1995‐2011)41
Tiller et al8 40% United States 67% (1995‐2011)41
Song et al32 67% China 94% (2003‐2011)24
Dobson et al33 Singletons: 64%
Twins: 40%
United States 67% (1995‐2011)41
Oepkes et al34 86%c The Netherlands 93% (2010)44
Chitty et al35 NIPT: 70%
IPD: 93%
Overall: 79%
United Kingdom 92% (2007‐2008)21
Gil et al36, 37 NIPT:44%
IPD: 93%
Overall: 73%
United Kingdom 92% (2007‐2008)21
Gil et al38 100%c Spain 96%d (2002‐2004)46
Qiang et al40 87% China 94% (2003‐2011)24
Le Conte et al39 100%c France 96%e (2002‐2004)46
Reported here NIPT: 67%
IPD: 93%
Overall: 88%
Singapore Not found
Reported here 62.7% United Kingdom 92% (2007‐2008)21
a

Termination rate calculated as a proportion of all pregnancies that had a high‐risk result for DS from NIPT (false positives and negatives excluded).

b

Termination rate calculated as a proportion of all pregnancies that had a definitive prenatal diagnosis of DS by IPD.

c

All high‐risk results from NIPT were confirmed by IPD.

d

Termination rate for EUROCAT (European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies) registry regions of Spain (Barcelona, Basque, Asturias, and Madrid).

e

Termination rate for EUROCAT (European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies) registry regions of France (Auvergne, Paris, Central East and Strasbourg).

Abbreviations: DS, Down syndrome; IPD, invasive prenatal diagnosis; NIPT, noninvasive prenatal testing.