Table 2.
Models 1 and 2
| Step 1: Entering controls | Step 2: Entering predictors | Step 3: Entering moderators | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: Predictors of Checking Time | |||
| Intercept | −0.05 (.10) | 0.04 (.11) | 0.04 (.11) |
| Control variables | |||
| Email Number | 0.02 (.01)* | 0.02 (.02) | 0.01 (.02) |
| Demanding Email | 0.01 (.01) | 0.02 (.01)* | 0.01 (.01) |
| Demanding Task | −0.02 (.01)* | −0.01 (.01) | −0.01 (.01) |
| Fixed effects | |||
| Before NA | −0.01 (.10) | 0.01 (.10) | |
| Conscientiousness | 0.23 (.10)** | 0.23 (.10)** | |
| Interaction effects | |||
| Conscientiousness* Before NA | 0.32 (.11)** | ||
| Model | |||
| Level 1 variance | 0.60 (.05)** | 0.65 (.06)** | 0.63 (.06)** |
| Level 2 variance | 0.40 (.10)** | 0.36 (.10)** | 0.36 (.10)** |
| 2*Log likelihood | 893.11 (N = 349) | 787.05 (N = 301) | 778.30 (N = 301) |
| Improvement in fit (χ2) |
59.50** (3 df) From null model |
106.06** (2 df) From Step 1 model |
8.75** (1 df) From Step 2 model |
| Model 2: Predictors of Momentary NA after processing an email interruption | |||
| Intercept | 2.43 (.11)** | 2.45 (.11)** | 2.45 (.11)** |
| Control variables | |||
| Email Number | −0.01 (.01) | −0.01 (.01) | −0.01 (.01) |
| Demanding Email | 0.05 (.01)** | 0.04 (.01)** | 0.04 (.01)** |
| Demanding Task | 0.01 (.01) | 0.01 (.01) | 0.01 (.01) |
| Fixed effects | |||
| Checking Time | 0.08 (.04)* | 0.07 (.04)* | |
| Conscientiousness | −0.15 (.11) | −0.15 (.11) | |
| Interaction effects | |||
| Checking Time*Conscientiousness | 0.11 (.04)** | ||
| Model | |||
| Level 1 variance | 0.30 (.03)** | 0.28 (.03)** | 0.27 (.02)** |
| Level 2 variance | 0.48 (.11)** | 0.46 (.11)** | 0.47 (.11)** |
| 2*Log Likelihood | 642.00 (N = 327) | 564.46 (N = 294) | 555.57 (N = 294) |
| Improvement in fit (χ2) |
52.54** (3 df) From null model |
77.54** (2 df) From Step 1 model |
8.89** (1 df) From Step 2 model |
Two‐tailed significance: *p < .05; **p < .01. Standard errors are in parentheses (all level 1 predictors are person‐mean centred).