Table 4.
Cool EF | Hot EF | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Backward digit-span | CNT-attention control | CNT-cognitive flexibility | Stroop-interference | SOC-problems solved inminimum moves | CGT-risk adjustment | CGT-Delayaversion | |
Backward | |||||||
digit-span | |||||||
CNT- | 0.18* | ||||||
attention control | |||||||
CNT- | −0.00 | 0.14 | |||||
cognitive flexibility | |||||||
Stroop- | −0.01 | 0.17a | −0.00 | ||||
interference | |||||||
SOC- | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.05 | |||
problems solved in minimum moves | |||||||
CGT- | −0.06 | −0.07 | 0.05 | 0.04 | −0.03 | ||
risk adjustment | |||||||
CGT-delay | −0.03 | −0.01 | −0.07 | −0.08 | 0.05 | −0.07 | |
aversion |
CNT, Contingency Naming Test; CGT, Cambridge Gambling Task; SOC, Stockings of Cambridge.
p < 0.05.
p = 0.07.