Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 15;12(1):81–87. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2018.5158

Table 3.

Comparison of the results of surgery before and after utilization of three varicocelectomy techniques


Item Group P value Power (%)
Laparoscopyn=22 Ivanissevichn=23 Palomon=25

Sperm concentration, million/mL*
  BS** 13.09 ± 9.88 18.26 ± 13.38 14.96 ± 12.89
  AS*** 21.86 ± 10.28 33.39 ± 14.66a 29 ± 13.69a 0.0255&
  P value# 0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Sperm normal motility (%)*, ^
  BS 16.86 ± 6.77 19.56 ± 8.51 18.72 ± 9.90
  AS 23.81 ± 9.55 31.95 ± 13.12b 32.80 ± 12.99b 0.0235&
  P value# 0.004 <0.001 <0.001
Sperm normal morphology (%)*
  BS 46.59 ± 14 48.04 ± 12.13 43.40 ± 20.03
  AS 54.55 ± 12.71c 57.39 ± 10.32cd 58.40 ± 15.72d 0.0475&
  P value# <0.001 0.001 <0.001
Atrophy, n(%)£ 0(0.00) 3(14.29) 1(4.55) 0.294 4.26

BS; Before surgery, AS; After surgery, *; Values are presented as mean ± SD, **; BS refer to values before surgery, ***; AS refer to values after surgery, #; The comparisons were made by Wilcoxon test, &; The Univariate general linear model was used for comparisons among the three groups, by considering the preoperative values of semen parameters as covariate, ^; Normal motility is sum of (A+B) motility type, £; The comparisons were made by Fisher’s exact test between the Laparoscopic and the open surgical techniques. The same lowercases showed no significant differences in post-hoc tests.