Skip to main content
Schizophrenia Bulletin logoLink to Schizophrenia Bulletin
. 2017 Aug 11;44(1):46–53. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx105

The Potential of Cannabidiol Treatment for Cannabis Users With Recent-Onset Psychosis

Britta Hahn 1,
PMCID: PMC5768049  PMID: 29083450

Abstract

A major factor associated with poor prognostic outcome after a first psychotic break is cannabis misuse, which is prevalent in schizophrenia and particularly common in individuals with recent-onset psychosis. Behavioral interventions aimed at reducing cannabis use have been unsuccessful in this population. Cannabidiol (CBD) is a phytocannabinoid found in cannabis, although at low concentrations in modern-day strains. CBD has a broad pharmacological profile, but contrary to ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), CBD does not activate CB1 or CB2 receptors and has at most subtle subjective effects. Growing evidence indicates that CBD acts as an antipsychotic and anxiolytic, and several reports suggest neuroprotective effects. Moreover, CBD attenuates THC’s detrimental effects, both acutely and chronically, including psychotogenic, anxiogenic, and deleterious cognitive effects. This suggests that CBD may improve the disease trajectory of individuals with early psychosis and comorbid cannabis misuse in particular—a population with currently poor prognostic outcome and no specialized effective intervention.

Keywords: cannabidiol, cannabis, psychosis, THC, first episode

Cannabis Use Detrimentally Affects Outcome in Individuals With Recent-Onset Psychosis

The prevalence of cannabis misuse is significantly greater in people with schizophrenia (PSZ) than in the general population.1,2 Cannabis use disorders are especially common in younger patients and patients with first-episode psychosis. Estimates of cannabis use at first break range from one to two thirds of affected individuals.3–6 The impact on conversion to psychosis has been studied extensively; frequent use doubles the risk of developing schizophrenia7 and is associated with a younger age at first episode.8 After the first break, estimates of continued use range from just over 50%5,9 to 100% of users.6

Cannabis use after a first psychotic break is a major predictor of bad prognostic outcome. This is of particular significance given that the early clinical trajectory of psychotic disorders is thought to critically influence long-term outcome.10–13 Cannabis use, especially heavy use, is associated with more and earlier psychotic relapses.14 Among users with first-episode psychosis, heavier users tend to experience more, and more severe, psychotic symptoms and show a poorer illness trajectory with regards to functional outcomes.15 Specifically, cannabis use is associated with more severe symptoms and poorer antipsychotic response in the positive and disorganized dimensions.16,17 Longitudinally, periods of cannabis use are accompanied by a dose-dependent increase in the odds of relapse to psychosis.18 Cannabis use is also associated with poorer medication adherence following a first break,6,19 and, in part related to that, a lower probability of remission during the following year.6 Effects of cannabis use on cognitive outcome in PSZ are more controversial. Several studies suggest paradoxical positive associations between use history and cognition,20,21 which may however reflect selection bias due to a role of cannabis in precipitating psychosis despite lower biological vulnerability, and the cognitive challenges associated with obtaining an illicit substance.

The acute effects of cannabis, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), or of the THC analog nabilone in nonpsychotic individuals mimic positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia,22–24 as well as neurophysiological phenomena associated with psychosis.25–28 In PSZ, THC acutely worsens psychotic symptoms and cognitive functions,29 and there is evidence that individuals with a predisposition for psychosis are more vulnerable to these acute psychotomimetic and cognitive-impairing effects.30 Chronically, cannabis abuse has detrimental effects on brain morphology specifically in PSZ with continuing consumption after conversion.31,32

Behavioral interventions targeted at reducing cannabis use in individuals with first-episode psychosis have been consistently unsuccessful (reviewed by Wisdom et al9). An effective treatment framework for this population is lacking entirely, and many programs available to individuals with early psychosis actively exclude for heavy, unmanaged cannabis abuse. Thus, there is an urgent need for novel treatments that reduce cannabis use or its detrimental consequences in people with recent-onset psychosis.

Cannabidiol

Cannabis contains >100 different cannabinoids; however, the phytocannabinoid THC is the main psychoactive component, thought responsible for the deleterious effects described above. Cannabidiol (CBD) is another phytocannabinoid in cannabis. Contrary to THC, it has at most subtle subjective effects and no euphorogenic properties,33 and it does not activate CB1 or CB2 cannabinoid receptors. Despite its very low affinity and absence of intrinsic activity, CBD appears to reduce the efficacy of THC and other agonists at CB1 and CB2 receptors.34–37 CBD antagonizes THC effects also via GPR55 receptors, which are activated by THC and blocked by CBD.35 CBD’s pharmacological profile further includes 5-HT1A receptor activation (in common with antidepressant drugs), adenosine reuptake inhibition,38–43 antioxidant44 and anti-inflammatory effects,45,46 suppression of immunoactivation-induced tryptophan degradation,47 binding and transient activation of TrpV1 vanilloid receptors,38 and upregulation of the endocannabinoid anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamine, AEA), the latter by interacting with fatty acid-binding proteins that mediate AEA’s cellular reuptake and transport to its catabolic enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH).38,48 CBD also inhibits T-type calcium channels,49 and the conversion of THC to the more psychoactive 11-OH-THC.36,50 Furthermore, there is evidence that CBD is a partial agonist at dopamine D2High receptors.51 For an in-depth review of CBD’s pharmacological actions, see Gururajan and Malone.52

While an early, small-N study suggested that CBD attenuates THC-induced euphoria,53 a recent investigation did not find that CBD alters the positive reinforcing effects of THC.54 However, lower appetitive effects of THC-associated stimuli were observed after smoking low-CBD than high-CBD strains of cannabis.55 Combined, these findings may suggest that chronic treatment with CBD has the potential of reducing cannabis use; however, there are to date no direct tests of this hypothesis.

Evidence that CBD counteracts detrimental effects of cannabis misuse is more plentiful:

CBD Counteracts Deleterious Effects of THC

Given acutely to healthy volunteers, oral CBD has been reported to reverse the acute psychotomimetic effects of THC,56,57 attenuate the anxiogenic and other subjective effects of THC,58,59 and counteract detrimental effects of THC on delayed episodic recall (but not on immediate recall or digit span)56 and of the THC analog nabilone on binocular depth inversion.24 Similarly, inhaled CBD was reported to counteract detrimental effects of THC on prose recall60 and facial emotion recognition.61 In parallel, several preclinical reports also suggest reversal of THC-induced cognitive deficits (reviewed by Osborne et al62). In an fMRI study, effects of acute CBD on BOLD responses were opposite to acute THC effects in regions including striatum, hippocampus, amygdala, and sensory cortex.57

That chronic CBD may attenuate psychotogenic effects of chronic THC was suggested by findings that higher levels of CBD in hair samples from cannabis users were associated with lower psychosis-like symptoms.63,64 Similarly, smokers of cannabis strains known to contain a higher proportion of CBD had lower positive-like symptoms than smokers of low-CBD cannabis.65 Furthermore, reductions in hippocampal volume and NAA, seen in chronic cannabis users, were not observed in users exposed to larger concentrations of CBD, consistent with neuroprotective effects.66

The CBD content of street cannabis has steadily decreased over the last two decades, resulting in a THC:CBD ratio of ~80:1 today, as compared with 14:1 in 1995.67 Thus, the fact that variation in CBD content of current street cannabis has detectable effects suggests that larger amounts, administered chronically in a controlled manner, may have clear protective effects. Interestingly, evidence was presented at a recent conference that chronic THC use increases striatal D1–D2 dopamine receptor heteromerization,68 a mechanism suggested to be associated with reduced hedonic value of stimulant drugs and natural rewards, depression, anxiety,69 and reduced reward learning in cannabis dependence.70 CBD attenuated the THC-induced increase in D1–D2 heteromerization,68 suggesting that it may help restore healthy reward processing, a mechanism of high relevance to schizophrenia71 and substance use disorders.72 Through this mechanism, as well as through potential attenuation of THC’s acute positive reinforcing effects,53,55 chronic CBD administration may not just reduce the deleterious effects of THC but also cannabis consumption itself, a hypothesis that remains to be tested.

Effects of CBD Alone

CBD appears to also benefit PSZ not using cannabis. In line with preclinical studies suggesting antipsychotic properties of CBD (reviewed by Gururajan and Malone52 and Schubart et al73), a 4-week treatment with CBD (600–800 mg/day p.o.) alleviated psychotic symptoms in otherwise unmedicated PSZ (N = 21) to a similar degree as amisulpride (N = 21), but with fewer side effects.74 Symptom reductions were quantified as changes over time relative to a no-drug baseline, without a placebo control, and did not differ between positive and negative symptom subscales. In a larger trial presented at a recent conference,75 CBD (1000 mg/day; N = 43) or placebo (N = 45) was administered p.o. for 6 weeks as adjunct medication to people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders stably medicated with conventional antipsychotics, but with residual symptoms. This study found significant reductions in positive but not negative symptoms with CBD relative to placebo, over and above the effects of the standard medication, and a near-significant trend toward cognitive improvement as measured with the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia.

In laboratory studies employing small sample sizes (N ≤ 15/group), single oral doses of CBD have been reported to reduce anxiety and associated physiological and BOLD changes in healthy individuals57,76–78 and in generalized social anxiety disorder.79 These effects would be of high clinical relevance to individuals with schizophrenia-related disorders given that anxiolytics are frequently prescribed to PSZ, including individuals with first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum disorders,80 and exposure to benzodiazepines is dose-dependently associated with increased mortality in PSZ.81 However, anxiolytic effects of chronically administered CBD remain to be confirmed in well-powered clinical trials.

Acute procognitive effects of CBD alone, in the absence of THC-induced impairment, may be suggested by findings of increased sensory cortical responses to visual and auditory stimulation82 and reduced reaction time83 in healthy subjects. However, there are also negative findings,57 and any further evidence to date is lacking. Procognitive effects of CBD when administered chronically may be expected due to its potent antioxidant44 and anti-inflammatory properties,46 especially in disorders with an etiology thought to involve oxidative stress and inflammatory processes, such as schizophrenia. Indeed, there is ample preclinical evidence for neuroprotective and procognitive properties of CBD in models of inflammation, ischemia, and excitotoxicity.50,62 In schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, evidence to date is limited to the trend reported by McGuire et al.75

Biological Target Mechanism

As described above, CBD has a broad spectrum of pharmacological actions. Thus, clinical benefits may result from several possible mechanisms:

  1. The recent finding that CBD is a partial agonist at dopamine D2High receptors,51 similar to the antipsychotic aripiprazole, may at least in part account for its antipsychotic effects and for its potential reduction of THC’s primary and secondary reinforcing effects. CBD’s efficacy as an adjunct to dopamine antagonists75 may indicate benefits derived from a more even (low) dopaminergic tone, reflecting this partial agonist action. Alternatively, it may point to additional, nondopaminergic mechanisms of CBD’s antipsychotic effects—a desirable possibility given that it would open up novel treatment avenues.

  2. CBD has been reported to up-regulate concentrations of the endocannabinoid AEA by inhibiting its reuptake and degradation.38,48 A 4-week treatment with CBD increased AEA serum levels in a small sample of PSZ, and this increase was associated with psychotic symptom reductions.74 Other studies suggest that anxiolytic effects, too, may be mediated by AEA up-regulation.84,85 Findings that AEA concentrations are elevated in CSF of acutely psychotic PSZ86 may reflect a counter-adaptive response because in first-break antipsychotic-naive patients, AEA levels were inversely correlated with psychotic symptoms.87–89 Similarly, AEA was elevated in CSF of prodromal individuals, and those with higher AEA levels displayed later transition into frank psychosis.90 Heavy cannabis use is associated with AEA reduction in individuals with first-episode psychosis89 and without psychosis,91 and lower CSF AEA in the latter group was associated with persistent psychosis-like symptoms.91 Thus, benefits from AEA up-regulation by CBD may be particularly pronounced in psychosis with comorbid cannabis use.

  3. Other pharmacological targets of CBD potentially responsible for its clinical benefits include, but are not limited to, 5-HT1A receptors, GPR55 receptors, and TrpV1 receptors.52,92 However, any connections drawn between these targets and the clinical effects described above would be speculative at this point in time.

Further research is warranted to determine which, or more likely, which combination of the above mechanisms is responsible for CBD’s clinically beneficial actions and attenuation of THC effects. The fact that no single mechanism can to date be denoted as “the” target mechanism should not detract from its clinical potential.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of CBD

CBD is highly lipophilic and readily crosses the blood brain barrier.93 It has a long half-life in humans: 18–33 h after i.v. administration,94 and 2–5 days after chronic oral dosing with ~700 mg/day, with no sex difference.95 Some CBD metabolites are biologically active and may contribute to CBD’s effects profile, although not via action at CB receptors.96

Large doses are necessary to compensate for the low bioavailability of oral CBD.33,54,97 Haney et al54 found that an 800-mg dose of CBD generated an average peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 77.9 ng/ml 3 h (tmax) after acute dosing. Inter-individual variability was substantial. Bhattacharyya et al57 found much lower CBD blood levels of 17 ± 29 ng/ml 2 h after administration (ie, preceding tmax) with a 600-mg dose, and Englund et al56 reported average blood levels of ~50 ng/ml 3:45 h after oral administration of the same dose. None of the above studies made any reference to the inactive capsule filler. Manini et al33 administered oral CBD encapsulated and dissolved in corn oil and reported better bioavailability with relatively lower variability: A dose of 800 mg resulted in Cmax of 221.1 ± 35.6 ng/ml with tmax of 3 h, and 400 mg resulted in Cmax of 181.2 ± 39.8 ng/ml at 3 h.

CBD has an extensive record of clinical study in subjects with a variety of conditions, including pain, multiple sclerosis, anxiety, psychosis, and epilepsy, with an excellent safety and tolerability profile, no noticeable psychiatric adverse effects, and no motor impairment (reviewed by Bergamaschi et al98). Doses of up to 1280 mg of CBD have been administered to humans without toxicity or serious adverse events.98–100 Studies assessing cognitive performance did not report any impairment with CBD.54,56,57,101

CBD at acute doses of up to 800 mg did not have any effect on heart rate or blood pressure.33,54,58,79,101,102 Leweke et al74 reports that a 4-week treatment with 600–800 mg of oral CBD per day did not significantly affect hepatic or cardiac function in PSZ. A 6-week trial in Huntington’s disease patients detected no systematic abnormalities specifically associated with CBD treatment (~700 mg/day) in blood chemistry, complete blood count and differential, prolactin levels, and urinalysis.102 Similarly, the administration of 200–400 mg of CBD to participants with and without epilepsy for 1–4.5 months did not result in any changes in vital signs or labs. A few reports of somnolence may have been due in part to concomitant use of antiepileptic medication.103 Other studies did not report any subjective effects of CBD (400–800 mg p.o.) other than anxiolytic effects or reversal of adverse effects of THC.33,54,57,58,61,79,102,104 The only exception is one study reporting a modest increase in self-reported sedation.105

Haney et al54 found that 5 out of 31 study participants reported “gastrointestinal upset” within 72 h of ingesting an 800-mg dose of CBD, as compared with 1, 2, and 1 participants ingesting placebo, 200 and 400 mg, respectively. Similarly, Manini et al33 reported gastrointestinal side effects in 1 out of 6 participants exposed to an 800-mg dose of CBD. Thus, 800 mg of CBD (p.o.) may be pushing the upper dose limit, although the preliminary report of a trial in PSZ did not mention any such side effects with chronic administration of 1000 mg of CBD per day.75

There is no indication of mutagenic effects of CBD.106 In vitro studies have shown that CBD can suppress production of interleukin 8 and 10107 and induce lymphocyte apoptosis108 at micromolar concentrations; thus, there is a theoretical risk of immunosuppression. However, other results suggested a potential biphasic response, with stimulatory action at nanomolar concentrations.43,98 CBD in the micromolar range also exhibited inhibitory effects on P-glycoprotein efflux and ATPase activity.98 The extent to which in vitro effects of these concentrations are predictive of potential side effects at the nanomolar concentrations found in human serum after CBD administration is unclear.

CBD acutely inhibits the cytochrome P450 2B, 2C, and 3A subfamilies in vitro, with potential induction after long-term exposure.98 Again, concentrations associated with these interactions were in the micromolar range and significantly higher than found in human blood.109 However, the possibility of an altered bioavailability of compounds that are primarily metabolized by these cytochromes has to be considered. Such compounds include (but are not limited to) alprazolam, bupropion, carbamazepine, citalopram, clozapine, diazepam, imipramine, sertraline, valproic acid, and zolpidem. Importantly, a recent trial testing 1000 mg of CBD per day vs placebo in PSZ treated with conventional antipsychotics reported no adverse effects specifically associated with the CBD arm,75 which suggests that CBD may be a safe adjunct medication.

Summary: Potential Benefits of CBD for Cannabis Users With Recent-Onset Psychosis

The antipsychotic, anxiolytic, and potential procognitive effects of CBD, in the absence of side effects typically seen with conventional medication, would constitute a desirable effects profile for individuals with any schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. In particular, however, its reversal of psychotogenic, anxiogenic, and cognitive-impairing effects of THC, both acutely and chronically, would suggest CBD as a tailored intervention for individuals with psychosis and comorbid cannabis misuse, who constitute a large proportion of patients in the early stages of schizophrenia-related disorders. By potentially dampening the positive reinforcing effects of THC and restoring healthy reward processing, CBD may even reduce cannabis use itself. It has to be emphasized, however, that most of these suggested benefits are based on laboratory studies, in part employing small sample sizes, and confirmation by well-powered randomized clinical trials is largely pending. Clearly, this field is at an early stage, with expectations at risk of overtaking evidence. To date, there are promising leads warranting larger trials to confirm or test CBD’s efficacy in reducing positive symptoms, anxiety, cognitive deficits, and cannabis misuse. The combination of these beneficial effects, initiated early in the disease course, would hold the promise to substantially improve the clinical trajectory and long-term outcome of individuals with psychosis and comorbid cannabis misuse, in particular, a population with currently poor prognosis and no specialized effective intervention.

References

  • 1. Kovasznay B, Fleischer J, Tanenberg-Karant M, Jandorf L, Miller AD, Bromet E. Substance use disorder and the early course of illness in schizophrenia and affective psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 1997;23:195–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Green B, Young R, Kavanagh D. Cannabis use and misuse prevalence among people with psychosis. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187:306–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Baeza I, Graell M, Moreno D et al. . Cannabis use in children and adolescents with first episode psychosis: influence on psychopathology and short-term outcome (CAFEPS study). Schizophr Res. 2009;113:129–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Barbeito S, Vega P, Ruiz de Azúa S et al. . Cannabis use and involuntary admission may mediate long-term adherence in first-episode psychosis patients: a prospective longitudinal study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Myles H, Myles N, Large M. Cannabis use in first episode psychosis: Meta-analysis of prevalence, and the time course of initiation and continued use. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016;50:208–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Colizzi M, Carra E, Fraietta S et al. . Substance use, medication adherence and outcome one year following a first episode of psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2016;170:311–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Arseneault L, Cannon M, Witton J, Murray RM. Causal association between cannabis and psychosis: examination of the evidence. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;184:110–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Veen ND, Selten JP, van der Tweel I, Feller WG, Hoek HW, Kahn RS. Cannabis use and age at onset of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:501–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wisdom JP, Manuel JI, Drake RE. Substance use disorder among people with first-episode psychosis: a systematic review of course and treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62:1007–1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Melle I, Larsen TK, Haahr U et al. . Reducing the duration of untreated first-episode psychosis: effects on clinical presentation. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:143–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mihalopoulos C, Harris M, Henry L, Harrigan S, McGorry P. Is early intervention in psychosis cost-effective over the long term?Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:909–918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Henry LP, Amminger GP, Harris MG et al. . The EPPIC follow-up study of first-episode psychosis: longer-term clinical and functional outcome 7 years after index admission. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71:716–728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hegelstad WT, Larsen TK, Auestad B et al. . Long-term follow-up of the TIPS early detection in psychosis study: effects on 10-year outcome. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169:374–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Linszen DH, Dingemans PM, Lenior ME. Cannabis abuse and the course of recent-onset schizophrenic disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:273–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bagot KS, Milin R, Kaminer Y. Adolescent initiation of cannabis use and early-onset psychosis. Subst Abus. 2015;36:524–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Grech A, Van Os J, Jones PB, Lewis SW, Murray RM. Cannabis use and outcome of recent onset psychosis. Eur Psychiatry. 2005;20:349–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Pelayo-Terán JM, Diaz FJ, Pérez-Iglesias R et al. . Trajectories of symptom dimensions in short-term response to antipsychotic treatment in patients with a first episode of non-affective psychosis. Psychol Med. 2014;44:37–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Schoeler T, Petros N, Di Forti M et al. . Association between continued cannabis use and risk of relapse in first-episode psychosis: a quasi-experimental investigation within an observational study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:1173–1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Miller R, Ream G, McCormack J, Gunduz-Bruce H, Sevy S, Robinson D. A prospective study of cannabis use as a risk factor for non-adherence and treatment dropout in first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2009;113:138–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Løberg EM, Hugdahl K. Cannabis use and cognition in schizophrenia. Front Hum Neurosci. 2009;3:53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Yücel M, Bora E, Lubman DI et al. . The impact of cannabis use on cognitive functioning in patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of existing findings and new data in a first-episode sample. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:316–330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Sherif M, Radhakrishnan R, D’Souza DC, Ranganathan M. Human laboratory studies on cannabinoids and psychosis. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;79:526–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bossong MG, Jansma JM, Bhattacharyya S, Ramsey NF. Role of the endocannabinoid system in brain functions relevant for schizophrenia: an overview of human challenge studies with cannabis or ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014;52:53–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Leweke FM, Schneider U, Radwan M, Schmidt E, Emrich HM. Different effects of nabilone and cannabidiol on binocular depth inversion in man. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2000;66:175–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Morrison PD, Nottage J, Stone JM et al. . Disruption of frontal θ coherence by Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol is associated with positive psychotic symptoms. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:827–836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Stone JM, Morrison PD, Brugger S et al. . Communication breakdown: delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol effects on pre-speech neural coherence. Mol Psychiatry. 2012;17:568–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. D’Souza DC, Fridberg DJ, Skosnik PD et al. . Dose-related modulation of event-related potentials to novel and target stimuli by intravenous Δ⁹-THC in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37:1632–1646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Cortes-Briones J, Skosnik PD, Mathalon D et al. . Δ9-THC disrupts gamma (γ)-band neural oscillations in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:2124–2134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. D’Souza DC, Abi-Saab WM, Madonick S et al. . Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol effects in schizophrenia: implications for cognition, psychosis, and addiction. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57:594–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Henquet C, Rosa A, Krabbendam L et al. . An experimental study of catechol-o-methyltransferase Val158Met moderation of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced effects on psychosis and cognition. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:2748–2757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Malchow B, Hasan A, Fusar-Poli P, Schmitt A, Falkai P, Wobrock T. Cannabis abuse and brain morphology in schizophrenia: a review of the available evidence. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013;263:3–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Van Haren NE, Cahn W, Hulshoff Pol HE, Kahn RS. Confounders of excessive brain volume loss in schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:2418–2423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Manini AF, Yiannoulos G, Bergamaschi MM et al. . Safety and pharmacokinetics of oral cannabidiol when administered concomitantly with intravenous fentanyl in humans. J Addict Med. 2015;9:204–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Thomas A, Baillie GL, Phillips AM, Razdan RK, Ross RA, Pertwee RG. Cannabidiol displays unexpectedly high potency as an antagonist of CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists in vitro. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;150:613–623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Pertwee RG. The diverse CB1 and CB2 receptor pharmacology of three plant cannabinoids: delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153:199–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Russo EB. Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;163:1344–1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. McPartland JM, Duncan M, Di Marzo V, Pertwee RG. Are cannabidiol and Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabivarin negative modulators of the endocannabinoid system? A systematic review. Br J Pharmacol. 2015;172:737–753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Bisogno T, Hanus L, De Petrocellis L et al. . Molecular targets for cannabidiol and its synthetic analogues: effect on vanilloid VR1 receptors and on the cellular uptake and enzymatic hydrolysis of anandamide. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;134:845–852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Pertwee RG, Thomas A, Stevenson LA, Maor Y, Mechoulam R. Evidence that (-)-7-hydroxy-4′-dimethylheptyl-cannabidiol activates a non-CB(1), non-CB(2), non-TRPV1 target in the mouse vas deferens. Neuropharmacology. 2005;48:1139–1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Izzo AA, Borrelli F, Capasso R, Di Marzo V, Mechoulam R. Non-psychotropic plant cannabinoids: new therapeutic opportunities from an ancient herb. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009;30:515–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Mishima K, Hayakawa K, Abe K et al. . Cannabidiol prevents cerebral infarction via a serotonergic 5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptor-dependent mechanism. Stroke 2005;36:1077–1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ryberg E, Larsson N, Sjögren S et al. . The orphan receptor GPR55 is a novel cannabinoid receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;152:1092–1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Jenny M, Santer E, Pirich E, Schennach H, Fuchs D. Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol modulate mitogen-induced tryptophan degradation and neopterin formation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. J Neuroimmunol. 2009;207:75–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Mechoulam R, Parker LA, Gallily R. Cannabidiol: an overview of some pharmacological aspects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;42:11S–19S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Malfait AM, Gallily R, Sumariwalla PF et al. . The nonpsychoactive cannabis constituent cannabidiol is an oral anti-arthritic therapeutic in murine collagen-induced arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:9561–9566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Burstein S. Cannabidiol (CBD) and its analogs: a review of their effects on inflammation. Bioorg Med Chem. 2015;23:1377–1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Jenny M, Schröcksnadel S, Überall F, Fuchs D. The potential role of cannabinoids in modulating serotonergic signaling by their influence on tryptophan metabolism. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2010;3:2647–2660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Elmes MW, Kaczocha M, Berger WT et al. . Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are intracellular carriers for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). J Biol Chem. 2015;290:8711–8721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ross HR, Napier I, Connor M. Inhibition of recombinant human T-type calcium channels by delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:16124–16134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Russo E, Guy GW. A tale of two cannabinoids: the therapeutic rationale for combining tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol. Med Hypotheses. 2006;66:234–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Seeman P. Cannabidiol is a partial agonist at dopamine D2High receptors, predicting its antipsychotic clinical dose. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6:e920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Gururajan A, Malone DT. Does cannabidiol have a role in the treatment of schizophrenia?Schizophr Res. 2016;176:281–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Dalton WS, Martz R, Lemberger L, Rodda BE, Forney RB. Influence of cannabidiol on delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol effects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976;19:300–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Haney M, Malcolm RJ, Babalonis S et al. . Oral cannabidiol does not alter the subjective, reinforcing or cardiovascular effects of smoked cannabis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41:1974–1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Morgan CJ, Freeman TP, Schafer GL, Curran HV. Cannabidiol attenuates the appetitive effects of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in humans smoking their chosen cannabis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:1879–1885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Englund A, Morrison PD, Nottage J et al. . Cannabidiol inhibits THC-elicited paranoid symptoms and hippocampal-dependent memory impairment. J Psychopharmacol. 2013;27:19–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Bhattacharyya S, Morrison PD, Fusar-Poli P et al. . Opposite effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on human brain function and psychopathology. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:764–774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Karniol IG, Shirakawa I, Kasinski N, Pfeferman A, Carlini EA. Cannabidiol interferes with the effects of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in man. Eur J Pharmacol. 1974;28:172–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Zuardi AW, Shirakawa I, Finkelfarb E, Karniol IG. Action of cannabidiol on the anxiety and other effects produced by delta 9-THC in normal subjects. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1982;76:245–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Morgan CJ, Schafer G, Freeman TP, Curran HV. Impact of cannabidiol on the acute memory and psychotomimetic effects of smoked cannabis: naturalistic study: naturalistic study [corrected]. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;197:285–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Hindocha C, Freeman TP, Schafer G et al. . Acute effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and their combination on facial emotion recognition: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in cannabis users. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;25:325–334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Osborne AL, Solowij N, Weston-Green K. A systematic review of the effect of cannabidiol on cognitive function: Relevance to schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017;72: 310–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Morgan CJ, Curran HV. Effects of cannabidiol on schizophrenia-like symptoms in people who use cannabis. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192:306–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Morgan CJ, Gardener C, Schafer G et al. . Sub-chronic impact of cannabinoids in street cannabis on cognition, psychotic-like symptoms and psychological well-being. Psychol Med. 2012;42:391–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Schubart CD, Sommer IE, van Gastel WA, Goetgebuer RL, Kahn RS, Boks MP. Cannabis with high cannabidiol content is associated with fewer psychotic experiences. Schizophr Res. 2011;130:216–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Yücel M, Lorenzetti V, Suo C et al. . Hippocampal harms, protection and recovery following regular cannabis use. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6:e710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. ElSohly MA, Mehmedic Z, Foster S, Gon C, Chandra S, Church JC. Changes in cannabis potency over the last 2 decades (1995–2014): analysis of current data in the United States. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;79:613–619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Madras BH, Hasbi A, Jacobs D, Kohut S, Bergman J, George S. Dramatic increase of dopamine D1-D2 receptor heteromers by tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in primate caudate nucleus is attenuated by cannabidiol (CBD). American College for Neuropsychopharmacology 55th Annual Meeting Holliwood, Florida, 3–8 December 2016:Poster M245. [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Shen MY, Perreault ML, Bambico FR et al. . Rapid anti-depressant and anxiolytic actions following dopamine D1-D2 receptor heteromer inactivation. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;25:2437–2448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Lawn W, Freeman TP, Pope RA et al. . Acute and chronic effects of cannabinoids on effort-related decision-making and reward learning: an evaluation of the cannabis ‘amotivational’ hypotheses. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016;233:3537–3552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Strauss GP, Waltz JA, Gold JM. A review of reward processing and motivational impairment in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40(suppl 2):S107–S116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Balodis IM, Potenza MN. Anticipatory reward processing in addicted populations: a focus on the monetary incentive delay task. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77:434–444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Schubart CD, Sommer IE, Fusar-Poli P, de Witte L, Kahn RS, Boks MP. Cannabidiol as a potential treatment for psychosis. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;24:51–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Leweke FM, Piomelli D, Pahlisch F et al. . Cannabidiol enhances anandamide signaling and alleviates psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry. 2012;2:e94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. McGuire P, Robson P, Cubala WJ, Vasile D, Morrison PD, Wright S. A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial of cannabidiol as adjunctive therapy in the first line treatment of schizophrenia or related psychotic disorder. Schizophrenia International Research Society (SIRS) Biannual Meeting Florence, Italy; 2016. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/862312#vp_2. [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Fusar-Poli P, Crippa JA, Bhattacharyya S et al. . Distinct effects of {delta}9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on neural activation during emotional processing. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:95–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Zuardi AW, Cosme RA, Graeff FG, Guimarães FS. Effects of ipsapirone and cannabidiol on human experimental anxiety. J Psychopharmacol. 1993;7:82–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Zuardi AW, Rodrigues NP, Silva AL et al. . Inverted U-shaped dose-response curve of the anxiolytic effect of cannabidiol during public speaking in real life. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Bergamaschi MM, Queiroz RH, Chagas MH et al. . Cannabidiol reduces the anxiety induced by simulated public speaking in treatment-naïve social phobia patients. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:1219–1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Robinson DG, Schooler NR, John M et al. . Prescription practices in the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders: data from the national RAISE-ETP study. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172:237–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Tiihonen J, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Torniainen M, Alexanderson K, Tanskanen A. Mortality and cumulative exposure to antipsychotics, antidepressants, and benzodiazepines in patients with schizophrenia: an observational follow-up study. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173:600–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Winton-Brown TT, Allen P, Bhattacharyya S et al. . Modulation of auditory and visual processing by delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol: an FMRI study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:1340–1348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Bhattacharyya S, Atakan Z, Martin-Santos R, Crippa JA, McGuire PK. Neural mechanisms for the cannabinoid modulation of cognition and affect in man: a critical review of neuroimaging studies. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18:5045–5054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Scherma M, Medalie J, Fratta W et al. . The endogenous cannabinoid anandamide has effects on motivation and anxiety that are revealed by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibition. Neuropharmacology. 2008;54:129–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Fowler CJ. The potential of inhibitors of endocannabinoid metabolism as anxiolytic and antidepressive drugs—a practical view. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;25:749–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. De Marchi N, De Petrocellis L, Orlando P, Daniele F, Fezza F, Di Marzo V. Endocannabinoid signalling in the blood of patients with schizophrenia. Lipids Health Dis. 2003;2:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Leweke FM, Giuffrida A, Wurster U, Emrich HM, Piomelli D. Elevated endogenous cannabinoids in schizophrenia. Neuroreport. 1999;10:1665–1669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Giuffrida A, Leweke FM, Gerth CW et al. . Cerebrospinal anandamide levels are elevated in acute schizophrenia and are inversely correlated with psychotic symptoms. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:2108–2114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Leweke FM, Giuffrida A, Koethe D et al. . Anandamide levels in cerebrospinal fluid of first-episode schizophrenic patients: impact of cannabis use. Schizophr Res. 2007;94:29–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Koethe D, Giuffrida A, Schreiber D et al. . Anandamide elevation in cerebrospinal fluid in initial prodromal states of psychosis. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;194:371–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Morgan CJ, Page E, Schaefer C et al. . Cerebrospinal fluid anandamide levels, cannabis use and psychotic-like symptoms. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:381–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Long LE, Malone DT, Taylor DA. Cannabidiol reverses MK-801-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:795–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Deiana S, Watanabe A, Yamasaki Y et al. . Plasma and brain pharmacokinetic profile of cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidivarine (CBDV), Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) and cannabigerol (CBG) in rats and mice following oral and intraperitoneal administration and CBD action on obsessive-compulsive behaviour. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012;219:859–873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Agurell S, Halldin M, Lindgren JE et al. . Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of delta 1-tetrahydrocannabinol and other cannabinoids with emphasis on man. Pharmacol Rev. 1986;38:21–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Consroe P, Kennedy K, Schram K. Assay of plasma cannabidiol by capillary gas chromatography/ion trap mass spectroscopy following high-dose repeated daily oral administration in humans. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991;40:517–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Ujvary I, Hanus L. Human metabolites of cannabidiol: a review on their formation, biological activity, and relevance in therapy. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2016;1:90–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Huestis MA. Human cannabinoid pharmacokinetics. Chem Biodivers. 2007;4:1770–1804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Bergamaschi MM, Queiroz RH, Zuardi AW, Crippa JA. Safety and side effects of cannabidiol, a Cannabis sativa constituent. Curr Drug Saf. 2011;6:237–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Zuardi AW, Hallak JE, Dursun SM et al. . Cannabidiol monotherapy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol. 2006;20:683–686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Zuardi A, Crippa J, Dursun S et al. . Cannabidiol was ineffective for manic episode of bipolar affective disorder. J Psychopharmacol. 2010;24:135–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Borgwardt SJ, Allen P, Bhattacharyya S et al. . Neural basis of Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol: effects during response inhibition. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;64:966–973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Consroe P, Laguna J, Allender J et al. . Controlled clinical trial of cannabidiol in Huntington’s disease. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991;40:701–708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Cunha JM, Carlini EA, Pereira AE et al. . Chronic administration of cannabidiol to healthy volunteers and epileptic patients. Pharmacology. 1980;21:175–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Crippa JA, Derenusson GN, Ferrari TB et al. . Neural basis of anxiolytic effects of cannabidiol (CBD) in generalized social anxiety disorder: a preliminary report. J Psychopharmacol. 2011;25:121–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Crippa JA, Zuardi AW, Garrido GE et al. . Effects of cannabidiol (CBD) on regional cerebral blood flow. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:417–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Matsuyama SS, Fu TK. In vivo cytogenetic effects of cannabinoids. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1981;1:135–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Srivastava MD, Srivastava BI, Brouhard B. Delta9 tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol alter cytokine production by human immune cells. Immunopharmacology. 1998;40:179–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Wu HY, Chu RM, Wang CC, Lee CY, Lin SH, Jan TR. Cannabidiol-induced apoptosis in primary lymphocytes is associated with oxidative stress-dependent activation of caspase-8. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008;226:260–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Anderson GD, Chan LN. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with tobacco, cannabinoids and smoking cessation products. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:1353–1368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Schizophrenia Bulletin are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES