Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 1;8(69):113817–113827. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22852

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for OS.

Prognostic Factor Univariate Multivariate
HR(95%CI) P HR p
Tumor size (≤2 cm vs. >2 cm) 1.85(1.441-2.366) 0.04 1.51(1.166-1.961) 0.02
Tumor number (single vs. multiple) 2.54(1.873-3.432) <0.001 2.45(1.780-3.371) <0.001
CA19-9 (≤37 U/L vs. >37 U/L) 2.18(1.627-2.912) <0.001 1.61(1.181-2.210) 0.03
CEA (≤5 μg/L vs. >5 μg/L) 2.29(1.687-3.110) <0.001 1.64(1.186-2.264) 0.03
GGT (≤50 U vs. >50 U) 2.11(1.581-2.828) <0.001 1.42(1.043-1.949) 0.04
Adjunctive therapy (yes vs. no) 0.85(0.637-1.129) 0.26
Vessel invasion (yes vs. no) 1.17(0.782-1.747) 0.72
ALT (≤41 U vs. >41 U) 1.29(0.906-1.817) 0.16
AST (≤38 U vs. >38 U) 1.33(0.946-1.875) 0.10
TB (≤17.1 μmol/L vs. >17.1 μmol/L) 0.94(0.522-1.679) 0.83
DB (≤7 μmol/L vs. >7 μmol/L) 1.21(0.799-1.825) 0.37
Ascites (yes vs. no) 1.37(0.606-3.081) 0.45
LND (yes vs. no) 1.29(0.900-1.859) 0.17

OS, overall survival; HR, Hazards ratio; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate transaminase; T, total bilirubin; DB, direct bilirubin; LND, lymph node dissection.