Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2017 Nov 4;196:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.030

Table 4.

Condom use peer norm interaction model results.


	Norm moderator
	Descriptive condom use	Injunctive condom use	Encourage condom use	Friend-reported condom use

	aOR (95%CI)	aOR (95%CI)	aOR (95%CI)	aOR (95%CI)
Main effect model
ΔAnxiety	1.14 (0.86, 1.51)	1.04 (0.76, 1.47)	1.14 (0.86, 1.51)	1.09 (0.79, 1.51)
ΔDepression	0.71 (0.54, 0.93)^*	0.69 (0.53, 0.91)^**	0.70 (0.53, 0.91)^*	0.69 (0.50, 0.96)^*
ΔNorm	1.63 (1.20, 2.22)^**	1.14 (0.84, 1.55)	1.54 (1.15, 2.05)^**	0.81 (0.55, 1.19)

Interaction model
ΔAnxiety	1.07 (0.79, 1.44)	1.11 (0.83, 1.43)	1.04 (0.77, 1.40)	1.09 (0.78, 1.54)
ΔDepression	0.71 (0.53, 0.94)^*	0.67 (0.49, 0.91)^**	0.72 (0.54, 0.95)^*	0.69 (0.50, 0.97)^*
ΔNorm	1.58 (1.16, 2.15)^**	1.11 (0.82, 1.52)	1.52 (1.14, 2.04)^**	0.81 (0.55, 1.18)
ΔAnxiety × ΔNorm	1.95 (1.10, 3.47)^*	1.25 (0.71, 2.20)	1.75 (1.01, 3.02)^*	1.03 (0.45, 2.37)
ΔDepression × ΔNorm	0.79 (0.46, 1.33)	1.10 (0.64, 1.89)	0.78 (0.48, 1.26)	1.05 (0.48, 2.26)

^*

p<0.05;

^**

p<0.01;

^***

p<0.001;

Δ indicates change the listed variable

Note: All models include controls for condition, age, education level, SES, and ever having been married.