Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 22;33(1):148–156. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2016.116

Table 3.

Significant predictors for composite cardiac endpoint: results of multivariate Cox-regression analysis

Variable Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value
Whole subjects
 Age, 1 year increase 1.03 (1.01-1.05) 0.001 1.02 (1.00-1.05) 0.025
 Diabetes, presence 2.85 (1.56-5.18) 0.001 2.48 (1.27-4.86) 0.008
 Statin, use 1.26 (0.75-2.12) 0.201 - -
 Previous history of CAD, presence 3.36 (2.01-5.41) < 0.001 2.40 (1.29-4.47) 0.006
 hs-CRP, 1 mg/L increase 1.25 (1.01-1.53) 0.030 1.25 (1.01-1.55) 0.040
 LVEF < 50% vs. ≥ 50% 2.50 (1.54-4.00) < 0.001 1.99 (1.12-4.19) 0.043
 Concentric LVH, presence 2.02 (1.06-3.85) 0.032 1.55 (1.05-2.85) 0.058
SSS < 4
 Age, 1 year increase 1.03 (1.01-1.06) 0.010 1.04 (1.01-1.07) 0.007
 Diabetes, presence 3.89 (1.63-9.31) 0.002 2.45 (1.01-5.61) 0.034
 Statin, use 1.10 (0.81-1.69) 0.102 - -
 Previous history of CAD, presence 2.67 (1.23-5.83) 0.013 4.17 (1.78-10.23) 0.002
 hs-CRP, 1 mg/L increase 1.46 (1.02-2.10) 0.036 1.47 (1.01-2.09) 0.042
 LVEF < 50% vs. ≥ 50% 2.74 (1.33-5.65) 0.006 2.47 (1.11-5.56) 0.030
 Concentric LVH, presence 2.01 (1.02-3.83) 0.031 1.21 (1.02-1.68) 0.016

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence intervals; CAD, coronary artery disease; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; SSS, summed stress score.