Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 11;8:2653. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02653

Table 1.

Summary of the results of Medihoney and antibiotic treatments on S. aureus.

Checkerboard combination assay with Medihoney
Microdilution assayc MacSynergy II analysisd Effect on cell viabilitye
MICa (% w/v or μg/ml) Biofilm eradicationb (% w/v or μg/ml) Additive interaction Honey-antibiotic concentrations with additive interaction (% w/v–μg/ml) Overall MacSynergy conclusion Honey-antibiotic concentrations with significant synergistic peaks (% w/v–μg/ml)
Medihoney 8 16 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rifampicin 0.04 >4 Yes 8–0.01 8–0.02 Strongly synergistic 1–0.01 2–0.04 4–0.01 4–0.04 8–0.01 Significant
Clindamycin 0.08 0.8 Yes 8–0.02 8–0.04 Antagonistic 2–0.04 2–0.32 Significant
Fusidic acid 0.08 2.4 Yes 8–0.02 8–0.04 Synergistic, minor 8–0.02 8–0.04 8–0.16 Not significant
Gentamicin 0.626 >62.5 No N/A Antagonistic N/A N/A
Oxacillin 0.16 0.48 No N/A Antagonistic N/A N/A
a

MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration, expressed as the mean % weight per volume for honey or μg/ml for antibiotics from three separate experiments.

b

Data presented in Figure 1. Results expressed as concentration of agent required to achieve ≥85% eradication compared to the untreated control, % weight per volume for honey or μg/ml for antibiotics.

c

Data presented in Figure 2, concentrations expressed as % weight per volume for honey and μg/ml for antibiotic.

d

Data presented in Figure 3, concentrations expressed as % weight per volume for honey and μg/ml for antibiotic.

e

Data presented in Figure 4, left panel. Statistical significance determined using one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05.

N/A, not applicable.