Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 14;24(2):274–289. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i2.274

Table 1.

Quality assessment of all the 16 randomized controlled trials found in literature and included in this study

Ref. Randomization Allocation concealment Blind Withdrawal and dropout Jadad score ITT
Yonemura et al[29], 1993 Adequate Inadequate Adequate Well reported 5 NR
Shchepotin et al[30], 1995 Unclear Unclear Inadequate NR 1 NR
Kang et al[31], 1996 Unclear Unclear Inadequate Well reported 3 NR
Lygidakis et al[32], 1999 Inadequate Unclear Inadequate Well reported 2 NR
Takiguchi et al[33], 2000 Unclear Inadequate inadequate Well reported 2 NR
Wang et al[22], 2000 Unclear Unclear Inadequate Well reported 3 NR
Kobayashi et al[35], 2000 Adequate Adequate Inadequate Well reported 5 NR
Hartgrink et al[4], 2004 Adequate Adequate Inadequate Well reported 5 NR
Nio et al[36], 2004 Inadequate Inadequate Inadequate Well reported 1 NR
Zhao et al[37], 2006 unclear Unclear Inadequate Well reported 3 NR
Cunningham et al[17], 2006 Adequate Adequate Adequate Well reported 7 YES
Schuhmacher et al[15], 2010 Unclear Unclear Unclear Well reported 4 YES
Imano et al[38], 2010 unclear unclear Unclear Well reported 4 NR
Biffi et al[39], 2010 Unclear Unclear Unclear Well reported 4 YES
Qu et al[40], 2010 Adequate Unclear Unclear NR 4 NR
Ychou et al[18], 2011 Adequate Well reported Unclear Well reported 6 YES

NR: Not reported; ITT: Intention-to-treat analysis.