Table 4.
Study, country | Period | Setup | No. of patients | Node dissection | 5-yr OS rates |
Cunningham et al[17] United Kingdom | 1994-2002 | MC RCT | 503 | D2 in 40% S/42% NAC | NAC + S 36.3% Surgery alone 23% |
Ychou et al[18] France | 1995-2003 | MC RCT | 224 | No data on type of LND | NAC + S 38% Surgery alone 24% |
Maruyama et al[48] Japan | 1991-2009 | MC Retr | 11261 | D2 | AJCC Stage II 73.1% AJCC stage III 44.5% |
Wu et al[53] Taiwan | 1993-1999 | MC RCT | 110/111 | D1 vs D3 | D1 53.6%/ D3 59.5% |
Kim et al[49] South Korea | 2009-2011 | MC Retr | 1561 | D2 | AJCC Stage II 86.5% AJCC Stage III 63.7% |
Siewert et al[50] Germany | 1986-1989 | MC Prosp | 1096 | D2 | 46.60% |
Sue-Ling et al[51] United Kingdom | 1970-1989 | SI Prosp | 207 | D2 | 55% |
Viste et al[54] Norway | 1980-1990 | SI Retr | 105 | D2 | 47% |
Robertson et al[55] Hong Kong | 1987-1991 | SI RCT | 25/30 | D1 vs D2 | D1 45%/D2 35% |
Dent et al[56] South Africa | 1982-1985 | SS RCT | 22/21 | D1 vs D2 | D1 69%/D2 67% |
Bonenkamp et al[57] The Netherlands | 1989-1993 | MC RCT | 380/331 | D1 vs D2 | D1/D2: 45%/47% D2, pT2: 44% D2, pT3: 22% D2, LN-/LN+: 69%/30% |
Degiuli et al[13] Italy | 1998-2006 | MC RCT | 133/134 | D1 vs D2 | D1 /D2: 66.5%/64.2% D2 pT2-T4: 59% D2 pT2-pT4 N+: 51% |
MC: Multicenter; RCT: Randomized control trial; Retr: Retrospective study; NAC: Neoadjuvant chemoterapy; S: Surgery; Prosp: Prospective study; SI: Single institution; SS: Single surgeon; LND: Lymph node dissection; OS: Overall survival; AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer; LN+: Lymph node positive; LN-: Lymph node negative; D1: D1 lymph node dissection; D2: D2 lymph node dissection; D3: D3 lymph node dissection; NR: Not reported; pT2: Pathological TNM T2 stage; pT3: Pathological TNM T3 stage.