Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 18;3:99–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.12.007

Table 3.

Modeled estimates of the impact of characteristics of patients and spousal homogamy/heterogamy (Models III and IV) on the risk of death for cancer patients with cancer forms common for both sexes.a

Male and female patients
Male patients
Female patients
Model III
Model IV
Model III
Model IV
Model III
Model IV
ORb 95% CIc OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Female patients 1 Ref 1 Ref N/Ad N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Male patients 1.33 1.31–1.35 1.33 1.30–1.35 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Spousal homogamy/heterogamy
Patient and spouse similar age (±5 yrs) 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref
Patient >5 yrs older than spouse 1.03 1.01–1.04 1.02 1.00–1.04 1.02 1.01–1.03 1.01 1.00–1.03 1.14 1.07–1.21 1.07 1.01–1.14
Spouse >5 yrs older than patient 0.97 0.94–0.99 0.96 0.94–0.98 1.06 1.01–1.11 1.01 0.96–1.07 0.95 0.92–0.97 0.95 0.92–0.97
Both spouses low educatione 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref
Patient low/spouse high education 0.86 0.83–0.88 0.89 0.87–0.92 0.83 0.80–0.86 0.88 0.84–0.91 0.87 0.84–0.91 0.91 0.88–0.94
Patient high/spouse low education 0.85 0.83–0.87 0.88 0.86–0.91 0.85 0.83–0.87 0.88 0.87–0.91 0.86 0.81–0.92 0.87 0.81–0.93
Both spouses high education 0.77 0.75–0.79 0.85 0.82–0.88 0.77 0.75–0.80 0.85 0.82–0.88 0.77 0.72–0.81 0.85 0.80–0.90
Lowest income quintile 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref
4th income quintile 0.96 0.95–0.98 0.96 0.94–0.97 0.95 0.93–0.98 0.94 0.91–0.96 0.98 0.95–1.01 0.98 0.95–1.01
3rd income quintile 0.95 0.93–0.97 0.95 0.93–0.97 0.93 0.91–0.95 0.93 0.90–0.95 0.96 0.92–0.99 0.96 0.93–1.00
2nd income quintile 0.90 0.88–0.92 0.90 0.88–0.92 0.87 0.85–0.89 0.87 0.85–0.89 0.95 0.92–0.99 0.94 0.91–0.98
Highest income quintile 0.82 0.80–0.84 0.84 0.82–0.86 0.80 0.77–0.82 0.80 0.78–0.82 0.87 0.83–0.91 0.90 0.86–0.94
Spouses earn a similar share (40–60%) 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref 1 Ref
Patient earns a smaller share (<40%) 1.11 1.08–1.14 1.10 1.07–1.13 1.10 1.06–1.14 1.08 1.04–1.11 1.23 1.16–1.30 1.21 1.15–1.28
Patient earns a larger share (>60%) 0.98 0.96–1.00 0.99 0.97–1.02 0.94 0.91–0.96 0.95 0.93–0.97 1.19 1.12–1.26 1.13 1.06–1.19
Household income is 0 or missingf 1.15 1.12–1.18 1.13 1.10–1.16 1.08 1.05–1.11 1.08 1.02–1.09 1.39 1.32–1.47 1.31 1.24–1.39
Baseline controlsg Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Control for cancer stage and typeh No Yes No Yes No Yes
a

This table portrays estimates from two: Models III and IV. The models portray discrepancies in spousal characteristic without and with control for cancer stage and form.

b

Odds ratio.

c

Confidence interval.

d

N/A refers to 'not applicable'.

e

Low education refers to no education beyond high school and high education refers to any college education.

f

No share calculated.

g

Baseline controls for all models include time since diagnosis, calendar period, patient age and number of children.

h

Categorizations are shown in Table 1.