Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 30;3:37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.11.008

Table 1.

Average predicted absolute increase in healthcare access delay for phone users (in days).

Sequence-insensitive measures
Sequence-sensitive measure
Difference between delay estimates based on sequence-insensitive and sequence-sensitive measures in percent
Option a) Phone ownership
Option b) Any health- related use
Option c) Use during access
Option d) Relevant phone use
Rajasthan
Gansu
Rajasthan
Gansu
Rajasthan
Gansu
Rajasthan
Gansu
Rajasthan
Gansu
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) [(1) - (7)] (7) (10) [(3) - (7)] (7) (11) [(5) - (7)] (7) (12) [(2) - (8)] (8) (13) [(4) - (8)] (8) (14) [(6) - (8)] (8)
Any Healthcare Provider (n=592) 0.0a 0.0a +11.0 +3.0 +6.0 +1.9 +7.4 +2.1 –100% +50% –18% –100% +42% –12%
Public Providers (n=380) 0.0a 0.0a +34.2 +3.6 +39.2 +3.7 +41.8 +4.0 –100% –18% –6% –100% –9% –5%
Private Providers (n=264) 0.0a 0.0a +10.5 +1.1 0.0a 0.0a +7.3 +0.7 –100% +43% –100% –100% +43% –100%
Informal Providers (n=81) +63.8 +0.9 +168.5 +1.3 0.0a 0.0a 0.0a 0.0a N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Notes: Predicted values based on negative binomial regression model with village-cluster robust standard errors. Observations at the illness episode level, with up to one self-reported “mild” and “severe” illness per person.

a

Coefficient in negative binomial regression model was not statistically significant at the 10% level.

Source: Authors.