Table 2.
Main results of logit regression models to evaluate “ideal” processes of public healthcare access.
|
Sequence insensitive |
Sequence sensitive |
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of “Ideal a)” |
Evaluation of “Ideal b)” |
Evaluation of “Ideal c)” |
|
|
Any public healthcare access |
Public healthcare access with adherence to referral |
Public healthcare access Without prior informal/Private care |
|
|
Coefficient (Standard error) |
Coefficient (Standard error) |
Coefficient (Standard error) |
|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | |
| Household Asset Index Quintile | −0.135 (0.082) | −0.258** (0.110) | −0.228** (0.102) |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.093 | 0.320 | 0.270 |
| Number of Observations | 669 | 649a | 669 |
Notes: Coefficients reported. Standard errors in parentheses. 28 control variables and constant omitted.
*p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01.
a
Variable “preference for other health providers” predicts failure perfectly. Variable dropped and 20 observations not used.
Source: Authors.