Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Med Inform. 2017 Nov 22;110:19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.11.014

Table 2.

Project members’ perceived differences in the beliefs of researchers/clinicians versus IT members about EHR IT

Misconception (1) Reality (10) Researchers/clinicians* mean (SD) HIT team* mean (SD) Diff. mean (SD) p-value
EHR IT is a single group EHR IT consists of multiple, specialized groups 2.76 (3.10) 9.50 (0.53) 6.39 (2.99) 0.003
All EHR IT members know the entire EHR functionality EHR IT members specialize more in some parts of the functionality than others 3.66 (2.38) 9.05 (0.91) 5.16 (2.59) 0.005
Changes to an EHR need the input of just a single EHR IT member Changes to an EHR need the input of many EHR IT members 4.76 (2.55) 9.37 (0.60) 4.63 (2.86) 0.01
The technological complexity of a project mirrors the clinical complexity (e.g., if the workflow is simple, IT build will be simple) The technological complexity of a project often differs from the clinical complexity 3.39 (3.00) 7.35 (2.86) 4.88 (4.16) 0.03
*

The value represents the distance (cm) from the left end of the 10-cm visual analog scale, where the left end was the misconception and the right end the reality as identified by the researchers.

When physician informaticists were excluded from analysis, the difference was no longer significant (p= 0.09).