Table 1.

A contingency table of the proportions of selection by 79 participants for individual emotion terms among coffee samples evaluated at the three different temperatures.

Terms1	Sample temperatures			Q-value	P-value	Cramér’s V value
	5°C	25°C	65°C
Active	0.25a	0.08b	0.24a	10.46	0.006	0.21
Bored	0.15ab	0.24a	0.09b	6.41	0.02	0.17
Calm	0.13b	0.25ab	0.33a	9.33	0.009	0.20
Disgusted	0.43a	0.39a	0.06b	28.26	<0.001	0.36
Eager	0.14ab	0.10b	0.25a	7.31	0.03	0.17
Energetic	0.29a	0.13b	0.28ab	7.48	0.02	0.18
Glad	0.10ab	0.05b	0.23a	10.76	0.004	0.22
Good	0.09b	0.18ab	0.33a	15.39	<0.001	0.25
Happy	0.14b	0.11b	0.33a	13.63	<0.001	0.24
Nostalgic	0.04b	0.09b	0.17a	7.60	0.02	0.18
Peaceful	0.09b	0.17b	0.33a	14.90	<0.001	0.25
Pleasant	0.19b	0.23ab	0.37a	7.24	0.03	0.17
Pleased	0.15b	0.17b	0.46a	23.53	<0.001	0.32
Satisfied	0.19b	0.10b	0.38a	16.84	<0.001	0.28
Warm	0.04b	0.04b	0.54a	68.09	<0.001	0.59
Wild	0.15a	0.14a	0.03b	8.67	0.01	0.19

Cochran’s Q-test (Cochran, 1950), using the exact probability and distribution of the Q statistic (Patil, 1975), was performed to determine whether the proportions of participant selection for individual terms of emotion check-all-that-apply (CATA) question could differ by sample temperature. The proportions with different letters within each row represent a significant difference determined by post hoc multiple pairwise comparisons using the Marascuilo procedure (Marascuilo and McSweeney, 1967). Cramér’s V value was used to measure strength of association between two nominal variables (sample temperature × selected/unselected case) for the contingency table. Cramér’s V values, ranging from 0 (no association between the variables) to 1 (perfect association), of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 were considered small, medium, and large associations, respectively (Cohen, 1988). ¹Only significant terms, determined by Cochran’s Q-test, among 39 emotion terms of the EsSense Profile^® (King and Meiselman, 2010) were shown (P < 0.05).