Table 4.
Reference | Study type | Number of patients | RT technique used | Median follow-up time (mo) | Local control | Overall survival | Acute toxicity (%) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hematological grade | Dermatological ≥ grade 3 | Gastrointestinal ≥ grade 3 | Genitourinary ≥ grade 3 | Pain ≥ grade 3 | |||||||
RTOG 9811 [1,10] | Phase III | 325 | Conventional technique | ND | 20% at 5 yearsa) | 78.3% at 5 years | 26 | 48 | 35 | 3 | 24 |
Satake et al. [15] | Retrospective | 7 | Conventional technique | 37.5 | 83.3% at 3 yearsb) | 100% at 3 years | 14 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 71 |
Kachnic et al. [21] | Retrospective | 43 | SIB-IMRT | 24 | 95% at 2 yearsc) | 94% at 2 years | 12 | 10 | 7 | 7 | ND |
RTOG 0529 [5] | Phase II | 52 | SIB-IMRT | ND | ND | ND | 27 | 23 | 21 | 2 | 23 |
Call et al. [19] | Retrospective | 34 | SIB-IMRT | 22 | 90% at 2 yearsc) | 93% at 2 years | 32 | 15 | 9 | ND | ND |
This study | Retrospective | 10 | SIB-IMRT | 46 | 88.9% at 3 yearsd) | 100% at 3 years | 50 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
RT, radiotherapy; ND, not described; SIB-IMRT, simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Locoregional failure rate.
Disease-free survival rate.
Local control rate.
Locoregional control rate.