Table 3. Results of the logistic regression analysis of the factors related to the endline outcome of use of postnatal care by a CHW or SMAG provider over a three year period.
Variables | Proportions N = 551 % (n)** |
ANC at least 4 times | Skilled Birth Attendance | postnatal care | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P-value | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P-value | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P-value | ||
Mother’s Literacy | |||||||
Cannot read at all | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Can read* | 1.40 (0.96–2.03) | 0.081 | 1.44 (1.14–1.99) | 0.028 | 1.59 (1.17–2.66) | 0.030 | |
Distance to the health facility | |||||||
Within 5 Km | 48 (262) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Beyond 5 km | 52 (289) | 0.58 (0.45–0.75) | 0.000 | 0.62 (0.47–0.81) | 0.000 | 1.03 (0 .79–1.35) | 0.126 |
Received HIV test Results during Pregnancy | |||||||
No | 15 (84) | 1 | 1 | ||||
Yes | 85 (465) | # | # | 1.72 (1.13–2.61) | 0.012 | 2.04 (0.95–4.37) | 0.068 |
Presence of a trained SMAG within the community | |||||||
No | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Yes | 1.20 (0.93–1.56) | 0.160 | 1.29 (0.96–1.72) | 0.096 | 1.86 (1.26–2.73) | 0.002 | |
‘Received Messages on birth preparedness from SMAG | |||||||
No | 31 (158) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Yes | 69 (349) | 1.70 (0.97–2.99) | 0.065 | 1.49 (1.10–2.00) | 0.009 | 1.76 (1.20–2.19) | 0.004 |
Received one ANC visit provided by skilled provider | |||||||
No | 33 (181) | 1 | 1 | ||||
Yes | 67 (366) | # | 4.01 (2.88–5.72) | 0.000 | 2.11 (1.49–3.68) | 0.008 | |
Skilled Birth Attendance | |||||||
No | 50 (276) | 1 | |||||
Yes | 50 (273) | # | # | 2.41 (1.82–3.15) | <0.001 |
# Predictor variable not included in the model for the individual outcome variable
*Women that could read the whole sentence or part of the sentence;
**Coverage at endline