Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 21.
Published before final editing as: Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Sep 21;27(6):1709–1722. doi: 10.1177/0962280216668554

Table 7.

Summary of the estimated parameters from the multiple sclerosis (MS) patients’ data from British Columbia, Canada (1995–2008).

Approach
HR^
se(HR^)
95% CI Weights
Average (SD) range
TD-Cox§ 1.29 0.23 0.91 – 1.82
Sequential Cox#, 1.23 0.32 0.74 – 2.07 1.00 ( 0.01 ) 0.74 – 1.63
Modified Sequential Cox*, @ 1.36 0.26 0.93 – 1.99 1.00 ( 0.01 ) 0.92 – 1.24
MSCM±, 1.31 0.23 0.92 – 1.84 1.00 ( 0.06 ) 0.37 – 1.60

TD-Cox, Cox model with time-dependent exposure.

§

Adjusts for baseline covariates L0 (sex, EDSS score, age and disease duration), and for the time-dependent confounder Lm ‘cumulative relapses’.

#

Adjusts for L0, Am and m.

The stabilized IPCW numerator model adjusts for Am and L0, while the denominator model additionally adjusts for Lm and lagged values of Lm via Aalen’s additive model.

*

Adjusts for baseline covariates L0, lagged values of Am, the time-dependent confounder L⃗m and lagged values of L⃗m.

@

For the stabilized IPCWs, the numerator model adjusts for Am and baseline variable L0, while the denominator model adjusts for L0, Am, L⃗m and lagged values of L⃗m via Aalen’s additive regression.

±

Adjusts for the potential baseline confounders L0.

The stabilized IPTW numerator model adjusts for a restricted cubic spline of the follow-up time-index, baseline confounders L0 and lagged values of Am to predict future treatment status. The denominator model additionally adjusts for the current and lagged values of cumulative relapses (Lm) via the pooled logistic models.