Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;166:400–424. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.034

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

One volunteer was scanned for testing purposes at different positions on the scanning table, depicting the effect of gradient distortion (note the warping in the neck). Correction for gradient distortion (C and D) substantially improves alignment. i: Subject placed low in the scanner (Baseline). ii: Subject placed in the centre of the scanner. iii: Subject placed higher into the scanner. A: ii (red outline) linearly registered to i (background) (Cross correlation: 0.90). B: iii (red outline) linearly registered to i (background) (Cross correlation: 0.83). C: ii (red outline) linearly registered to i (background) after GDC (Cross correlation: 0.98). D: iii (red outline) linearly registered to i (background) after GDC (Cross correlation: 0.96). Regions highlighting the largest effect (i.e. improved alignment of the ventricle) of the GDC have been zoomed to a 3:1 scale.