Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 4;44(1):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-5005-8

Table 2.

Absolute treatment effect for clinically important bleeding and pneumonia outcomes

Clinically important GI bleeding
Comparison RD per 1000 patients (95% CI) for ACR 2.1 for placebo%a Number needed to treat
H2RA vs placebo 8 fewer per 1000 (6 more to 14 fewer) 13
PPI vs H2RA 8 fewer per 1000 (from 4 fewer to 10 fewer) 13
H2RA vs sucralfate 3 fewer per 1000 (from 7 more to 9 fewer) 33
PPI vs placebo 16 fewer per 1000 (from 8 fewer to 19 fewer) 6
Sucralfate vs placebo 4 fewer per 1000 (from 13 fewer to 15 more) 25
PPI vs sucralfate 12 fewer per 1000 (from 6 fewer to 15 fewer) 8
Pneumonia outcome
Comparison RD per 1000 patients (95% CI) for ACR 6% in placebob Number needed to harm
H2RA vs placebo 11 more per 1000 (from 12 fewer to 42 more) 9
PPI vs H2RA 19 more per 1000 (from 3 fewer to 48 more) 5
H2RA vs sucralfate 17 more per 1000 (from 4 more to 32 more) 5
PPI vs placebo 31 more per 1000 (from 3 fewer to 85 more) 3
Placebo vs sucralfate 5 more per 1000 (from 15 fewer to 36 more) 20
PPI vs sucralfate 36 more per 1000 (from 11 more to 70 more) 3

RD risk difference, ACR assumed control event rate, H2RA histamine-2 receptor antagonists, PPI proton pump inhibitor, GI gastrointestinal

aThe median event rate of clinically important bleeding across all trials in placebo arm was 2.1%

bThe median event rate of pneumonia across all trials in placebo arm was 6%