Table 2.

Normalisation weights of the assessment indicators and real values in the sampling districts of Hunan Province, China

Code	Weight	RSR	Real value (${\displaystyle Xij}$=${\displaystyle X^{\prime }ij}$)					Normalisation value(${\displaystyle Yij}$)					Comprehensive normalisation values (${\displaystyle Z_{ij}}$)
			Furong	Ziyang	Shaodong	Shuangfeng	Luxi	Furong	Ziyang	Shaodong	Shuangfeng	Luxi	Furong	Ziyang	Shaodong	Shuangfeng	Luxi
a1*	20.13	0.0671	1	1	1	1	1	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.0300	0.0300	0.0300	0.0300	0.0300
a2*	9.53	0.0318	1	1	1	1	1	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.0142	0.0142	0.0142	0.0142	0.0142
a3*	18.13	0.0604	1	1	1	1	1	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.0270	0.0270	0.0270	0.0270	0.0270
a4	20.08	0.0669	2436.5	943.1	149.8	730.1	319.5	0.8907	0.3447	0.0547	0.2669	0.1168	0.0596	0.0231	0.0037	0.0179	0.0078
a5	11.76	0.0392	96.00	19.60	34.07	41.94	17.74	0.8474	0.1730	0.3007	0.3702	0.1566	0.0332	0.0068	0.0118	0.0145	0.0061
a6	12.21	0.0407	23.60	12.47	16.03	15.09	10.91	0.6506	0.3438	0.4418	0.4159	0.3006	0.0265	0.0140	0.0180	0.0169	0.0122
a7	10.32	0.0344	0.071	0.056	0.052	0.052	0.070	0.5186	0.4126	0.3848	0.3828	0.5160	0.0178	0.0142	0.0132	0.0132	0.0177
a8*	15.42	0.0514	1	1	1	1	1	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.0230	0.0230	0.0230	0.0230	0.0230
a9*	17.79	0.0593	1	1	1	1	1	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.0265	0.0265	0.0265	0.0265	0.0265
a10	12.08	0.0403	19	2	39	11	44	0.3026	0.0319	0.6211	0.1752	0.7007	0.0122	0.0013	0.0250	0.0071	0.0282
a11	12.08	0.0403	5	8	3	2	30	0.1580	0.2527	0.0948	0.0632	0.9477	0.0064	0.0102	0.0038	0.0025	0.0382
a12	6.82	0.0227	24	12	18	9	10	0.6857	0.3429	0.5143	0.2571	0.2857	0.0156	0.0078	0.0117	0.0058	0.0065
a13	6.82	0.0227	14	10	11	9	6	0.6058	0.4327	0.4760	0.3895	0.2596	0.0138	0.0098	0.0108	0.0088	0.0059
a14	5.79	0.0193	88	26	27	15	28	0.8731	0.2580	0.2679	0.1488	0.2778	0.0169	0.0050	0.0052	0.0029	0.0054
a15	9.39	0.0313	100	100	100	89.98	100	0.4560	0.4560	0.4560	0.4103	0.4560	0.0143	0.0143	0.0143	0.0128	0.0143
a16	7.50	0.025	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.0112	0.0112	0.0112	0.0112	0.0112
a17	15.03	0.0501	100	93	100	89.98	100	0.4625	0.4301	0.4625	0.4162	0.4625	0.0232	0.0216	0.0232	0.0208	0.0232
a18	9.68	0.0323	4.4	4.3	0.3	4.0	1.9	0.5783	0.5680	0.0365	0.5297	0.2472	0.0187	0.0183	0.0012	0.0171	0.0080
a19	10.13	0.0338	4	8	4	4	4	0.3536	0.7071	0.3536	0.3536	0.3536	0.0120	0.0239	0.0120	0.0120	0.0120
a20	13.55	0.0452	100	100	100	100	100	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.0202	0.0202	0.0202	0.0202	0.0202
a21	14.71	0.049	100	100	100	100	100	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.4472	0.0219	0.0219	0.0219	0.0219	0.0219
a22	17.61	0.0587	57.25	55.5	44.26	38.51	31.17	0.5516	0.5348	0.4265	0.3711	0.3003	0.0324	0.0314	0.0250	0.0218	0.0176
a23	11.76	0.0392	86.26	73.86	81.96	80.85	71.83	0.4875	0.4174	0.4632	0.4569	0.4059	0.0191	0.0164	0.0182	0.0179	0.0159
a24	11.68	0.0389	10.86	10.42	9.79	9.29	8.45	0.4957	0.4756	0.4468	0.4240	0.3857	0.0193	0.0185	0.0174	0.0165	0.0150

*Represents qualitative items: positive items were valued as 1, and the negative items were valued as 0.

RSR, rank sum ratio.