Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 27;7(12):e018245. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018245

Table 3.

Use of hormone replacement therapy by diet group of women in the EPIC-Oxford study

Diet group Participants answering the relevant question, n* Participants answering in the affirmative, n (%)* Prevalence ratio (95% CI)*
Meat eaters 6911 3098 (44.8) 1.00 (ref)
Fish eaters 1614 541 (33.5) 0.80 (0.73 to 0.88)
Vegetarians 1778 541 (30.4) 0.74 (0.68 to 0.81)
Vegans 188 31 (16.5) 0.42 (0.30 to 0.60)
P heterogeneity <0.0001

*Number answering the relevant question and n (%) answering in the affirmative were as observed. Prevalence ratios were adjusted for age at follow-up (50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74 years), region of residence (eight regions) and self-reported current health (excellent, good, fair, poor, unknown). Included postmenopausal women aged 50–74 who answered the relevant question on the second (10-year) follow-up questionnaire.