Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 16;15:7. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0629-1

Table 2.

Effects of chronic and lagged transient stressors on types of foods served at meals (i.e., fast food, pre-prepared food, homemade food) (N=61 participants; 383 observation days)a

Outcome: fast food Outcome: pre-prepared food Outcome: homemade food
Independent predictor variable Mean response 95% CI P valueb Mean response 95% CI P Value Mean response 95% CI P value
Chronic stressors
High chronic stress indicator (ref: low chronic stress) 0.08 (-0.06, 0.22) 0.237 -0.07 (-0.23, 0.10) 0.423 -0.09 (-0.24, 0.07) 0.269
Stressful life events (prior 6 months)
 Active (ref: no active events) -0.12 (-0.22, -0.01) 0.033 0.00 (-0.12, 0.13) 0.939 0.08 (-0.03, 0.20) 0.159
 Resolved (ref: no resolved events) 0.07 (-0.02, 0.17) 0.116 -0.05 (-0.16, 0.06) 0.383 -0.03 (-0.13, 0.07) 0.538
Transient stressors
Lagged sources of stress
"A lot of work at home, school, or job"
 L0. (same day) 0.06 (-0.01, 0.13) 0.070 -0.04 (-0.13, 0.04) 0.348 -0.01 (-0.10, 0.08) 0.855
 L1. (second day) 0.00 (-0.07, 0.06) 0.891 0.00 (-0.08, 0.08) 0.962 0.05 (-0.04, 0.14) 0.282
 L2. (third day) 0.02 (-0.05, 0.08) 0.579 0.00 (-0.08, 0.08) 0.975 -0.02 (-0.11, 0.06) 0.614
"Conflicts with spouse, partner, or children"
 L0. (same day)c 0.09 (0.02, 0.17) 0.018 -0.05 (-0.15, 0.05) 0.311 -0.03 (-0.13, 0.08) 0.620
 L1. (second day) -0.03 (-0.11, 0.05) 0.469 0.10 (0.00, 0.20) 0.047 0.00 (-0.10, 0.11) 0.964
 L2. (third day) 0.02 (-0.06, 0.10) 0.621 0.01 (-0.09, 0.1) 0.899 0.01 (-0.10, 0.11) 0.902
"Financial problems"
 L0. (same day) -0.02 (-0.17, 0.14) 0.808 0.22 (0.03, 0.42) 0.027 -0.01 (-0.22, 0.19) 0.913
 L1. (second day) 0.02 (-0.15, 0.19) 0.819 -0.13 (-0.34, 0.09) 0.244 0.14 (-0.08, 0.36) 0.210
 L2. (third day) 0.10 (-0.07, 0.26) 0.250 0.07 (-0.14, 0.28) 0.523 -0.24 (-0.46, -0.02) 0.035

aModel adjusted for: Parent sex, age, race, country of origin, relationship status, acculturation status (assimilation, separation, and integration), and day of the week

bBoldface values indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05

c Interpretation Example: Interpersonal transient stressors had positive relationships with fast food within-day (0.09, 95% CI: (0.02, 0.17), P=0.018)