Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 14;12(4):296–302. doi: 10.5114/pg.2017.72106

Table II.

Quality of bowel preparation and caecum visualisation score characteristics

Characteristic Value 95% CI
Overall bowel prep quality: N = 355
 Poor 14.08% (50/355) 10.64–18.14
 Fair 29.86% (16/355) 25.14–34.91
 Good 45.35% (161/355) 40.09–50.69
 Excellent 10.70% (38/355) 7.69–14.40
Initial caecum intubation position:
 Left lateral 66.76% (237/355) 61.59–71.64
 Supine 28.45% (101/355) 23.81–33.45
 Right lateral 4.79% (17/355) 2.81–7.56
Caecum Visualisation Score (at initial intubation position):
 Poor 4.79% (17/355) 2.81–7.56
 Fair 6.76% (24/355) 4.38–9.89
 Good 21.97% (78/355) 17.77–26.64
 Excellent 66.48% (236/355) 61.31–71.37
Caecum visualisation score (at initial intubation position LL): N = 237
 Poor 5.91% (14/237) 2.17–6.53
 Fair 6.33% (15/237) 2.38–6.87
 Good 23.63% (56/237) 12.14–19.99
 Excellent 64.14% (152/237) 37.61–48.15
Caecum visualisation score (at initial intubation position S): N = 101
 Poor 2.97% (3/101) 0.17–2.45
 Fair 7.92% (8/101) 0.98–4.39
 Good 19.80% (20/101) 3.47–8.57
 Excellent 69.31% (70/101) 15.71–24.24
Caecum visualisation score (at initial intubation position RL): N = 17
 Poor 0% (0/17) 0.00–0.84
 Fair 5.88% (1/17) 0.01–1.56
 Good 11.76% (2/17) 0.07–2.02
 Excellent 82.35% (14/17) 2.17–6.53