Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;28(1):55–65. doi: 10.1089/cap.2017.0099

Table 2.

Summary of Secondary Efficacy Outcomes at Week 8, Intent-to-Treat Population

CGI-S N Adjusted mean change (SE) Difference in adjusted means (placebo active) 95% CI p
Placebo 102 −1.49 (0.11)      
Desvenlafaxine low exposure 105 −1.51 (0.11) 0.015 −0.29, 0.32 0.923
Desvenlafaxine high exposure 106 −1.65 (0.11) 0.161 −0.14, 0.47 0.302
CGI-Ia N Very much improved (%) Much improved (%) Minimally improved (%) No change (%) CMH test p-value
Placebo 102 22 (21.6) 35 (34.3) 29 (28.4) 16 (15.7)  
Desvenlafaxine low exposure 105 20 (19.0) 39 (37.1) 26 (24.8) 19 (18.1) 0.696
Desvenlafaxine high exposure 106 27 (25.5) 39 (36.8) 23 (21.7) 16 (15.1) 0.462
CGI-I responseb Proportion responders % Adjusted odds ratio Wald 95% CI p
Placebo 57/102 55.9      
Desvenlafaxine low exposure 59/105 56.2 0.97 0.56, 1.69 0.925
Desvenlafaxine high exposure 66/106 62.3 0.76 0.44, 1.33 0.342
a

CGI-I scored as 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; 7, very much worse; 1 patient in each desvenlafaxine group scored 5 at week 8 and no patient scored 6 or 7 at week 8.

b

CGI-I response was defined as CGI-I score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved).

CGI-I, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement; CGI-S, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity; CI, confidence interval; CMH, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel; SE, standard error.