Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 20;57(1-2):16–116. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2016.1261939

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Pollen of ‘basal’ Loranthaceae, genera with ambiguous phylogenetic affinities. Pollen images (polar views) are mapped on the corresponding part of the bipartition network shown in Figure 3; morphologically and genetically well-circumscribed lineages (Psittacantinae s.str., Elytrantheae, Lorantheae) are collapsed for better visibility. Note that Type B pollen found in all genera except for Tupeia (Type A) share several, possibly plesiomorphic features of Loranthaceae such as a more or less prominently striate, well-developed margo (a), an essentially trilobate (b, modified in Tristerix) or convex-triangular (b′) outline in polar view, and a distinct (micro)baculate to -echinate mesocolpial sculpturing (c). White arrows indicate the position of colpi in Tupeia, all images are proportionally scaled to illustrate size differences. Abbreviations: [G], Gaiadendreae; [Nu], Nuytsieae; Psittacantheae: [L], Ligarinae; [No], Notantherinae; [P], Psittacanthinae (Aetanthus; misplaced due to a missing data artefact, see text); [T], Tupeinae.