Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 13;6:e30743. doi: 10.7554/eLife.30743

Table 3. Experimental lines from (Barkoulas et al., 2013), and one line from (Hoyos et al., 2011), referred in this study.

Levels used to model the lines were based on measurements of EGF mRNA levels from (Barkoulas et al., 2013) or fit, as indicated. For combined perturbations, we indicate the corresponding single perturbations lines.

EGF perturbation lines
CB1417 lin-3(e1417) hypomorph; level included as fitting parameter ~0.28 × WT
(measured as ~0.06 × WT in (Barkoulas et al., 2013) and ~0.22 × WT in [Saffer et al., 2011])
JU2036 measured as ~ 1.25 × WT
JU2035 measured as ~ 1.79 × WT
JU1107 measured as ~ 2.75 × WT
JU1100 (Hoyos et al., 2011) level included as fitting parameter ~4.2 × WT
(not measured)
Notch perturbation lines
JU2039 Pn.p cell-specific RNAi; level fit to phenotype strength ~0.4 × WT
JU2064 ectopic Notch activity; level included as fitting parameter ~WT + 0.05
JU2060 ectopic Notch activity; level fit to yield near-complete P4/8.p conversion ~ WT + 0.26
Combined perturbations
JU2113 JU2036 × JU2039
JU2091 JU2036 × JU2064
JU2089 JU2035 × JU2064
JU2092 JU1107 × JU2064
JU2095 CB1417 × JU2064