Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2017 Jul 17;79(4):2346–2358. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26831

Table 4.

Probability of Parameters to Predict Low (≤3 + 3, n = 10) Versus High (≥3 + 4, n = 14) Gleason Score for PZ Tumors.

Model Parameter b-Factors [s/mm2] PZ P-value of prediction Gleason low versus high
Monoexponential ADC 0–1250 0.07
250–1250 0.03
Biexponential fslow 0–3500 0.05
250–3500 0.03
Dslow 0–3500 0.39
250–3500 0.84
Dfast 0–3500 0.73
250–3500 0.84
Kurtosis ADCK 0–3500 0.03
250–3500 0.03
K 0–3500 0.03
250–3500 0.04
Stretched exponential DDC 0–3500 0.06
250–3500 0.16
Mode 0–3500 0.07
250–3500 0.12
α 0–3500 0.38
250–3500 0.81
Gamma distribution Mode: (k−1)·θ 0–3500 0.07
250–3500 0.03
k 0–3500 0.15
250–3500 0.34
θ 0–3500 0.78
250–3500 0.64