Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 6;29(1):110–120. doi: 10.1177/0956797617729816

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of the Never-Spanked Group and the Spanked Group Before and After Propensity Score Matching (PSM)

Variable Before PSM
After PSM
Never spanked
Spanked
p Spanked
Spanked
p
ns = 2,478–2,491 ns = 9,621–9,634 ns = 2,469–2,488 ns = 9,585–9,617
Child characteristics
 Age at spring of kindergarten (in months) 74.62 (4.36) 74.65 (4.44) > .250 74.70 (4.26) 74.72 (4.45) > .250
 Proportion male .50 .52 .044 .52 .52 > .250
 Overall health 1.71 (0.85) 1.71 (0.84) > .250 1.67 (0.82) 1.66 (0.81) > .250
 Proportion diagnosed with a disability .16 .15 > .250 .14 .14 > .250
 Externalizing behavior at age 5 years 1.61 (0.62) 1.70 (0.66) < .001 1.65 (0.64) 1.64 (0.62) > .250
Parent characteristics
 Mother’s education (in years) 14.89 (3.59) 14.44 (3.43) < .001 15.02 (3.59) 14.94 (3.37) > .250
 Mother’s age (in years) 34.12 (6.51) 32.92 (6.66) < .001 33.76 (6.41) 33.66 (6.43) > .250
 Proportion of mothers born in U.S. .82 .84 .098 .82 .83 > .250
 Proportion of parents married .71 .67 .015 .74 .75 > .250
 Proportion of parents separated .06 .05 .118 .03 .04 .229
 Proportion of parents divorced .09 .09 > .250 .08 .08 > .250
 Proportion of parents widowed .00 .01 .003 .01 .01 > .250
 Proportion of parents never married .11 .15 < .001 .11 .11 > .250
 Proportion of parents who were nonbiological/adoptive .03 .03 .010 .02 .02 > .250
Family economic status
 Household size 4.46 (1.37) 4.51 (1.39) .219 4.51 (1.38) 4.51 (1.34) > .250
 Proportion of mothers employed full time .45 .46 > .250 .46 .46 > .250
 Proportion of mothers employed part time .24 .21 .003 .22 .23 > .250
 Proportion of mothers unemployed .31 .33 .066 .32 .332 > .250
 Income (in thousands of dollars) 54.18 (39.49) 46.31 (35.58) < .001 53.47 (38.00) 52.35 (36.72) .207
 Family food insecurity 0.50 (1.60) 0.73 (1.95) < .001 0.54 (1.69) 0.56 (1.72) > .250
Harshness of home environment
 Parenting harshness 0.19 (0.14) 0.18 (0.15) < .001 0.19 (0.14) 0.19 (0.15) > .250
 Low parenting warmth 1.27 (0.37) 1.31 (0.38) < .001 1.32 (0.40) 1.32 (0.38) > .250
 Parenting stress 1.54 (0.45) 1.64 (0.48) < .001 1.61 (0.48) 1.61 (0.46) > .250
 Intimate partner conflict 0.49 (0.47) 0.56 (0.49) < .001 0.57 (0.50) 0.55 (0.48) .152
 Mother’s depressive symptoms 1.43 (0.47) 1.49 (0.47) < .001 1.46 (0.49) 1.45 (0.44) > .250
Cultural background
 Proportion White .63 .56 < .001 .61 .62 > .250
 Proportion Black .09 .18 < .001 .12 .12 > .250
 Proportion Asian/other .10 .07 < .001 .10 .10 > .250
 Proportion Latino .18 .19 > .250 .17 .17 > .250
 Proportion who spoke English at home .87 .88 .119 .88 .88 > .250
 Mother’s religiosity 2.83 (1.29) 2.89 (1.34) .044 2.96 (1.29) 2.96 (1.31) > .250
Geographic characteristics
 Proportion Northeast .29 .16 < .001 .17 .17 > .250
 Proportion Midwest .27 .22 < .001 .26 .26 > .250
 Proportion South .24 .40 < .001 .35 .35 > .250
 Proportion West .20 .22 .011 .22 .22 > .250
 Proportion city .36 .37 > .250 .37 .37 > .250
 Proportion suburb .47 .41 < .001 .40 .38 > .250
 Proportion town/rural .17 .22 < .001 .23 .24 .159

Note: Sample sizes varied across the 50 imputed data sets. The table presents means, unless otherwise indicated (standard deviations are given in parentheses); values were averaged across imputations.