Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 6;29(1):110–120. doi: 10.1177/0956797617729816

Table 2.

Demographic Characteristics of the Not-Spanked-in-Past-Week Group and the Spanked-in-Past-Week Group Before and After Propensity Score Matching (PSM)

Variable Before PSM
After PSM
Not spanked in past week
Spanked in past week
p Not spanked in past week
Spanked in past week
p
ns = 6,445–6,464 ns = 3,167–3,181 ns = 4,778–4,953 ns = 3,159–3,177
Child characteristics
 Age at spring of kindergarten (in months) 74.85 (4.45) 74.28 (4.40) < .001 74.38 (4.39) 74.35 (4.49) > .250
 Proportion male .51 .55 < .001 .54 .54 > .250
 Overall health 1.68 (0.83) 1.77 (0.85) < .001 1.74 (0.85) 1.74 (0.84) > .250
 Proportion diagnosed with a disability .15 .17 .015 .15 .15 > .250
 Externalizing behavior at age 5 years 1.64 (0.62) 1.81 (0.71) < .001 1.76 (0.68) 1.76 (0.67) > .250
Parent characteristics
 Mother’s education (in years) 14.64 (3.42) 14.05 (3.40) < .001 14.47 (3.47) 14.48 (3.37) > .250
 Mother’s age (in years) 33.39 (6.63) 32.04 (6.64) < .001 32.76 (6.39) 32.74 (6.50) > .250
 Proportion of mothers born in U.S. .84 .83 > .250 .81 .81 > .250
 Proportion of parents married .70 .62 < .001 .71 .71 > .250
 Proportion of parents separated .05 .05 > .250 .04 .04 > .250
 Proportion of parents divorced .09 .10 .107 .08 .08 > .250
 Proportion of parents widowed .01 .01 > .250 .01 .01 > .250
 Proportion of parents never married .12 .19 < .001 .14 .14 > .250
 Proportion of parents who were nonbiological/adoptive .03 .03 > .250 .02 .02 > .250
Family economic status
 Household size 4.51 (1.36) 4.51 (1.44) > .250 4.53 (1.40) 4.52 (1.38) > .250
 Proportion of mothers employed full time .46 .47 > .250 .46 .46 > .250
 Proportion of mothers employed part time .22 .19 .018 .20 .20 > .250
 Proportion of mothers unemployed .32 .34 .128 .34 .33 > .250
 Income (in thousands of dollars) 50.01 (36.09) 39.36 (33.51) < .001 45.03 (34.34) 44.84 (34.73) > .250
 Family food insecurity 0.59 (1.76) 0.98 (2.24) < .001 0.77 (2.04) 0.76 (1.95) > .250
Harshness of home environment
 Parenting harshness 0.19 (0.14) 0.18 (0.15) < .001 0.18 (0.15) 0.18 (0.15) > .250
 Low parenting warmth 1.29 (0.36) 1.35 (0.40) < .001 1.36 (0.41) 1.35 (0.40) > .250
 Parenting stress 1.59 (0.45) 1.73 (0.53) < .001 1.70 (0.50) 1.70 (0.50) > .250
 Intimate partner conflict 0.53 (0.48) 0.62 (0.50) < .001 0.61 (0.51) 0.61 (0.50) > .250
 Mother’s depressive symptoms 1.45 (0.46) 1.56 (0.50) < .001 1.52 (0.50) 1.51 (0.47) > .250
Cultural background
 Proportion White .59 .50 < .001 .55 .55 > .250
 Proportion Black .15 .22 < .001 .16 .16 > .250
 Proportion Asian/other .07 .07 > .250 .11 .10 > .250
 Proportion Latino ethnicity .18 .20 .047 .18 .18 > .250
 Proportion who spoke English at home .88 .87 .120 .86 .87 > .250
 Mother’s religiosity 2.86 (1.32) 2.96 (1.36) < .001 3.01 (1.32) 3.02 (1.33) > .250
Geographic characteristics
 Proportion Northeast .16 .14 .007 .15 .15 > .250
 Proportion Midwest .25 .18 < .001 .20 .21 > .250
 Proportion South .36 .48 < .001 .42 .43 > .250
 Proportion West .23 .20 .001 .22 .22 > .250
 Proportion city .37 .38 > .250 .38 .38 > .250
 Proportion suburb .42 .39 .006 .36 .36 > .250
 Proportion town/rural .21 .24 .037 .26 .26 > .250

Note: Sample sizes varied across the 50 imputed data sets. The table presents means, unless otherwise indicated (standard deviations are given in parentheses); values were averaged across imputations.