Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 6;29(1):110–120. doi: 10.1177/0956797617729816

Table 3.

Results From Regressions Predicting Child Externalizing Behavior From the Unmatched and Matched Groups

OLS regressions with unmatched samplesa
OLS regressions with matched samplesb
Age 6 externalizing behavior problems
Age 8 externalizing behavior problems
Age 6 externalizing behavior problems
Age 8 externalizing behavior problems
b 95% CI β p b 95% CI β p b 95% CI β p b 95% CI β p
Spanked (vs. never spanked) by age 5 0.04 [0.00, 0.12] 0.06 .038 0.03 [–0.01, 0.10] 0.04 .139 0.04 [0.01, 0.11] 0.06 .023 0.04 [0.01, 0.12] 0.07 .014
Spanked in past week (vs. not spanked in past week) at age 5 0.03 [–0.00, 0.11] 0.05 .059 0.07 [0.05, 0.16] 0.11 < .001 0.02 [–0.01, 0.09] 0.04 .140 0.06 [0.04, 0.15] 0.09 < .001

Note: Spanking was mother rated; externalizing behavior problems was teacher rated. OLS = ordinary least squares, CI = confidence interval.

a

Sample size for the regressions with unmatched spanked and never-spanked groups was 12,112. Sample size for the regressions with unmatched spanked-in-the-past-week and not-spanked-in-the-past-week groups was 9,629. These results were weighted to be nationally representative.

b

Sample size for the regressions with matched spanked and never-spanked groups was roughly 12,082 (sample sizes varied across imputations). Sample size for the regressions with matched spanked-in-the-past-week and not-spanked-in-the-past-week groups was roughly 8,008 (sample sizes varied across imputations).