Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 16;17(1):13–18. doi: 10.1007/s12663-016-0988-1

Table 3.

Success rates of reconstruction, implants placed and implant supported prosthesis in reconstructed areas with rhBMP-2

Author Success/reconstruction (patients) Success/implants Success/prosthesis (patients)
Cochran et al. 9 of 12 (75%) 13 of 13 (100%) 10 of 10 (100%)
Fiorellini et al. 30 of 43 (69.7%) NE NE
Boyne et al. 30 of 35 (85.7%) 131 of 153 (85.6%) 27 of 35 (77.1%)
Tripplett et al. 67 of 82 (81.7%) 199 of 241 (82.5%) 64 of 81 (79%)
de Freitas et al. 12 of 12 (100%) 32 of 32 100% 12 of 12 (100%)
Marx et al. 18 of 20 (90%) 57 of 61 (93%) NE
Coomes et al. 12 of 18 (66.6%) NE NE
Misch et al. 15 of 15 (100%) 40 of 40 (100%) 15 of 15 (100%)
Total 193 of 237 (81.4%) 472 of 540 (87.4%) 128 of 153 (83.6%)

NE not evaluated