Table 2.
Comparison between the fourth to fifth attempts and the sixth to seventh attempts
| Value | 2D start | 3D start | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4th–5th | 6th–7th | P value | 4th–5th | 6th–7th | P value | |
| Operative time (s) | ||||||
| Task 1 | 24.1 | 19.5 | 0.086 | 21.9 | 23.7 | 0.218 |
| Task 2 | 25.2 | 18.7 | 0.001* | 21.4 | 29.0 | 0.004** |
| Task 3 | 38.2 | 34.8 | 0.239 | 38.4 | 43.5 | 0.120 |
| Path length (mm) | ||||||
| Task 1 | 1419 | 1257 | 0.148 | 1314 | 1325 | 0.818 |
| Task 2 | 1204 | 970 | 0.019* | 1007 | 1303 | 0.003** |
| Task 3 | 1905 | 1725 | 0.209 | 1809 | 1944 | 0.229 |
| Technical errors (times) | ||||||
| Task 1 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.032* | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.231 |
| Task 2 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 0.027* | 0.7 | 3.2 | <0.001** |
| Task 3 | 11.9 | 8.0 | 0.021* | 8.2 | 11.6 | 0.005** |
* The performance in later phase was significantly better than in early phase
** The performance in later phase was significantly worse than in early phase