Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 17;8:930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18870-1

Table 1.

Psychophysics and clinical outcome comparison between both groups.

Outcome Measure REAL PHNT REAL Vs. PHNT
Acupuncture sensation intensity (0–10)
Aching 2.29 ± 1.87, p < 0.05 0.44 ± 0.81, p < 0.05 p < 0.01
Soreness 2.04 ± 1.70, p < 0.05 0.33 ± 0.97, p = 0.15 p < 0.01
Deep pressure 2.62 ± 1.88, p < 0.05 0.52 ± 1.20, p = 0.07 p < 0.01
Heaviness 2.44 ± 1.84, p < 0.05 0.57 ± 1.23, p < 0.05 p < 0.01
Fullness 1.86 ± 1.56, p < 0.05 0.25 ± 0.72, p = 0.14 p < 0.01
Tingling 2.21 ± 1.85, p < 0.05 0.26 ± 0.96, p = 0.24 p < 0.01
Dull pain 1.42 ± 1.29, p < 0.05 0.28 ± 0.72, p = 0.10 p < 0.01
Throbbing 0.94 ± 1.15, p < 0.05 0.20 ± 0.48, p = 0.08 p < 0.01
Sharp pain 2.06 ± 1.79, p < 0.05 0.26 ± 0.71, p = 0.12 p < 0.01
Spreading 1.46 ± 1.56, p < 0.05 0.46 ± 1.13, p = 0.08 p < 0.05
MASS index 2.88 ± 1.80, p < 0.05 0.61 ± 1.30, p < 0.05 p < 0.01
Low back pain intensity (0–10)
Pre-VAS 2.79 ± 1.63, p < 0.05 3.70 ± 1.49, p < 0.05 p < 0.05
Post-VAS 2.64 ± 1.34, p < 0.05 3.31 ± 1.70, p < 0.05 p = 0.25
Δ VAS −0.61 ± 1.66, p = 0.62 −0.56 ± 1.27, p < 0.05 p = 0.30