Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 16;52:1. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052006258

Table 2. Obstetric practices performed during labor, according to the presence of companion. South Region of Brazil, 2011. (n = 2,070).

Variable Presence of companion in labor
Yes No PR 95%CI aPRc 95%CI
n % n %
Diet offer (n = 1,938) 215 21.1 139 15.1a 1.39 1.15—1.69” 1.34 1.10-1.63b
Dietary prescription (n = 1,3 74) 2 75 37.5 177 27.7a 1.35 1.16—1.58” 1.34 1.15-1.57b
Free movement (n = 1.893) 614 62.0 509 56.4a 1.10 1.02-1.19a 1.07 0.99-1.15
NPM pain relief (n = 1,975) 411 40.2 265 2 7.8a 1.45 1.28-1.64 1.37 1.21-1.56b
Oxytocin (n = 1,875) 524 54.1 461 50.8 1.06 0.98-1.16 1.05 0.96-1.15
Amniotomy (n = 1,858) 517 53.5 435 48.8a 1.09 1.00-1.20” 1.10 1.01-1.21b
Trichotomy (n = 1,875) 321 33.2 503 55.5a 0.60 0.54-0.66a 0.59 0.53-0.65b
Enema (n = 1,875) 247 25.5 453 49.9a 0.51 0.45-0.58a 0.49 0.43-0.56b
Labor analgesia (n = 1,875) 117 12.1 46 5.1a 2.38 1.71-3.31a 1.84 1.33-2.54b
Vaginal delivery (n = 1,975) 889 87.1 853 89.4 0.97 0.94-1.00 0.99 0.96-1.02

PR: prevalence ratio; aPR: adjusted prevalence ratio; NPM: non-pharmacological method; ABIPEME: Economic classification recommended by the Brazilian Association of Research Companies

a

Chi-square test: p < 0.05

b

Wald test: p < 0.05

c

Adjusted for age, education level, payment of the delivery (public or private), parity, and ABIPEME score.